This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
contribute to changes in the sea bed morphology due to alteration of sediment transport patterns (see operation impact 3, section 7.6.2.3) or due to initiation of sea bed scour (see Impact 4, section 7.6.2.4).


313. Expert-based assessment suggests that each foundation would present an obstacle to the passage of currents locally, causing a small modification to the height and/or phase of the water levels and a wake in the current flow. This latter process involves a deceleration of flow immediately upstream and downstream of each foundation and an acceleration of flow around the sides of each foundation. Current speeds return to baseline conditions with progression downstream of each foundation and generally do not interact with wakes from adjacent foundations due to the separation distances.


314. There is a strong pre-existing scientific evidence base which demonstrates that the changes in the tidal regime due to the presence of foundation structures are both small in magnitude and localised in spatial extent. This is confirmed by existing guidance documents (ETSU 2000; ETSU 2002; COWRIE 2009) and numerous Environmental Statements for offshore windfarms.


315. This is further supported by previous Delft3D numerical modelling of changes in hydrodynamics associated with the proposed East Anglia ONE project (ABPmer 2012b). This modelling was based on a worst case of 240 gravity base structures (50m base diameter) and showed changes in water level of less than ±0.007m across a small geographical area.


316. In respect of changes in tidal currents, the previous modelling predicted maximum reductions in peak flow speeds of 0.05 to 0.1m/s and maximum increases in peak flow speeds of 0.05m/s, from peak baseline values for the proposed East Anglia ONE project of around 1m/s. The geographical extent of these maximum changes was largely confined to the near-field environment (a wake zone local to each wind turbine foundation).


7.6.2.1.1 Assessment of effect magnitude and/or impact significance 317. Given that the expert-based assessments of the changes in the tidal regime associated with the presence of foundation structures for the proposed East Anglia THREE project are consistent with the findings of the earlier modelling studies for the proposed East Anglia ONE project, there is high confidence in the assessment of effects.


Preliminary Environmental Information May 2014


East Anglia THREE Offshore Windfarm Chapter 7 Marine Geology, Oceanography and Physical Processes Page 62


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95