This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
21. Definition of the worst case assumptions has been made fromconsideration of the detail about the proposed East Anglia THREE project that is presented in Chapter 5 Description of the Development, alongside the mitigation measures that have been embedded in the design (section 7.3.3).


7.3.2.1 Layout 22.


The precise numbers, ratings and layout configuration of the wind turbines within the proposed East Anglia THREE project are not yet determined, and may not be known until sometime after the Development Consent Order (DCO) has been granted. However, within the East Anglia THREE site up to three different sizes of wind turbine could be used, but in any case the minimum and maximum sized wind turbines would be within the range 7 to 12MW.


23.


This means that in order to achieve the 1,200MW installed capacity, there could be a minimum of 100 12MWwind turbines or a maximum of 172 7MWwind turbines, or a combination of numbers and wind turbine ratings in between.


24.


The wind turbines would be arranged in blocks with regular rows, with a minimum spacing between adjacent wind turbines of 675m within each row and a minimum spacing of 900m between rows.


7.3.2.2 Foundations 25.


The precise foundation types and sizes for the wind turbines within the proposed East Anglia THREE project are unknown, and may not be known until sometime after the DCO has been granted. There could be only one type used or alternatively a combination of foundation types and sizes could be used across the windfarm site. Some types and sizes of foundation are more favourable for certain water depths, ground conditions or wind turbine models and the final arrangements would be confirmed during detail design considerations.


26.


Accordingly, to ensure the proposed East Anglia THREE project is adequately assessed for the purposes of EIA, foundation sizes covering the range from7MW to 12MW wind turbines, and including monopiles, tripods with pin piles, tripods with suction buckets, jackets with pin piles, jackets with suction buckets, suction caisson and gravity base structures have been considered to determine the worst case assumptions.


Preliminary Environmental Information May 2014


East Anglia THREE Offshore Windfarm Chapter 7 Marine Geology, Oceanography and Physical Processes Page 6


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95