This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Phase


Construction and Decommissioning


Potential Impact


Changes in suspended sediment concentrations as a result of GBS sea bed preparation activities and drilling for jacket installation.


WCS Details


GBS: 1 foundation installed/day. Dredging (in areas of sand waves) of up to 22,500m3 of surface sediment (characterised by grab samples, with 75% being medium sand and only 2% being mud) per foundation and disposal by barge (surface release) in close proximity to each foundation.


Construction and Decommissioning


Changes in bed levels and sediment type at the sea bed as a result of GBS sea bed preparation activities and drilling for jacket installation.


Construction and Decommissioning


Construction and Decommissioning


Construction and Decommissioning


Potential release of contaminants from the Warren Springs Environmental Disposal Site.


Changes in suspended sediment concentrations, bed levels and sediment type as a result of inter-array cable installation activities.


Changes in suspended sediment concentrations, bed levels and sediment type as a result of offshore cable installation activities.


Jacket: 1 jacket installed/48hrs. 50% of the 325 WTG jackets would be drilled, releasing 982m3 of sub-surface sediments (characterised by boreholes, clays, silts and sands) per jacket. 100% disaggregation into component particle sizes assumed (not considering cohesion and clastic properties). As above.


Assessment Method


• Numerical modelling using Delft3D- PART (15 plume releases over a 15 day spring-neap cycle run)


• Standard empirical equations (mobilisation and settling of sediment particles)


• Existing evidence base from marine aggregate dredging industry


• Conceptual understanding of potential impact


• Interpretation against baseline SSC values (summer and winter) and storm effects


• As above.


Assessment of Effect


Short term and localised increases in SSC may affect other receptors (e.g. marine water quality, fish, benthic ecology and marine mammals). Given the sediment types and tidal currents considered, the majority of sediment from GBS installation will rapidly (seconds to minutes) descend to the sea bed as a high concentration dynamic phase plume. It will form a mound on the bed, spreading radially under gravity. The remainder of the sediment will form a passive phase plume and become dispersed by tidal action before subsequently falling to the bed. Sands within this plume will settle within around 20 minutes of release, extending over an area of up to 1km. Finer sediments may persist for longer (hours to days) and travel over a wider area, with net movement to the north. For jackets, due to the finer nature of the sub-surface sediments, material may be transported over tends of kilometres from the release points.


Significance of impact on receptors = Not significant


For GBS, up to 2m thickness of deposition due to dynamic phase plume over a likely worst case area of 100m x 100m (10,000m2) near to each foundation. Less than 0.2mm thickness of deposition of finer material over a wider area during the passive phase plume. For jackets, up to a few centimetres of deposition of sand within a few hundred metres of release, with less than 0.025mm thickness of deposition of finer material over a considerably wider area during the passive phase plume. Significance of impact on receptors = Not significant


Potentially affected by GBS sea bed preparation activities, as described above.


Up to 550km of inter-array cable. Dredging in areas of large ripples and sand waves.


Jetting to bury cable to a depth of 5m along the entire offshore cable route.


• As above.


• Conceptual understanding of potential impact


• Numerical modelling using Delft3D- PART


• Existing evidence base from industry best practice guidance (BERR, 2008) and other wind farms (e.g. Nysted, Kentish Flats, Cromer)


• Conceptual understanding of potential impact


• Interpretation against baseline SSC values (summer and winter) and storm effects


Construction and Decommissioning


Interaction between bed preparation and foundation installation within the East Anglia ONE wind farm and sediment plumes created by installation of the East Anglia ONE offshore cable.


Construction and Decommissioning


Indentations on sea bed left by vessels (vessel jack-up and anchoring operations).


Construction programmes overlap such that plumes coalesce.


• Conceptual understanding of potential impact (based on tidal excursion ellipses)


Fate of contaminants dependent on release and deposition of bed sediments, as assessed above. Significance of impact on receptors = Not significant


Subordinate scale of potential impact compared against foundation installation, assessed above. Significance of impact on receptors = Not significant


Short term and localised increases in SSC due to installation, but baseline SSC values in shallower waters nearer to shore are greater than those further offshore across the wind farm site. Localised (<1km of release) concentrations up to 400mg/l in very shallow water, typically <100mg/l in deeper water (>20m water depth). Dispersion of fine-grained material within 180 hours of release.


Bed level changes of up to 2mm observed within a few hundred metres and up to 0.2mm observed 20km from cable.


Significance of impact on receptors = Not significant


There is only limited opportunity for plume combination due to the arrangement of the layout and cable route with respect to the tidal excursion ellipses. The combined plume may cover a slightly larger geographical area and, for a very short period of time, locally exhibit higher concentrations than assessed for foundation and offshore cable plumes individually. However, this higher concentration plume would not be expected to persist for much longer than a few hours.


Significance of impact on receptors = Not significant


Up to 6 legs of a jack-up barge. Each leg will have a maximum diameter of 16m and form footprint between 50 – 200m2. Penetration


Phys_Proc_background Sept 2013


• Conceptual understanding of potential impact


As each leg is inserted it will cause the already partially consolidated sediments to be compressed downwards and displaced laterally. This may cause the sea bed around the inserted leg to be raised in a series of concentric pressure ridges. As the leg is retracted, some material that has


East Anglia THREE & East Anglia FOUR Page 36


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231