Table
17.2.Consultation Responses Consultee
The Planning Inspectorate on behalf of the Secretary of State (SoS)
Date /Document
December 2012/Scoping Responses
Comment
The SoS notes that a geophysical survey will be carried out on the East Anglia THREE site and the area of the export cable corridor not covered within the previous East Anglia ONE surveys. In order for the geophysical data collected for the East Anglia ONE development to be sufficient for the East Anglia THREE development in respect of the offshore cable route, the applicant should ensure that this data remains up to date and relevant and when available new data should also be taken into account.
SoS
December 2012/Scoping Responses
The SoS emphasises the importance that the methodology for geotechnical surveys and archaeological interpretation is agreed with English Heritage. Confirmation of this should be provided within the ES.
Response / where addressed in the PEIR
This PEIR was informed by the archaeological assessment of up- to-date geophysical data obtained for East Anglia THREE between June and October 2012. The results of this assessment are presented in Appendix 17.2 and inform section 17.5 of this chapter.
Further geotechnical survey programmes would be designed inclusive of archaeological objectives in line with the Offshore Geotechnical Investigations and Historic Environment Analysis (Emu 2011). Such surveys would be subject to a project specific WSI which would be prepared in accordance with the Model Clauses for Archaeological Written Schemes of Investigation (WS, Wessex Archaeology and The Crown Estate 2010) and will be prepared in agreement with EH. See section 17.3.3.
SoS SoS
December 2012/Scoping Responses
December 2012/Scoping Responses
The applicant should ensure that they address the comments of EH, including the information required within the ES and of the application of a ‘worst case scenario’.
The ES should clearly define mitigation of impacts upon marine archaeology and cultural heritage that is embedded within the design of the proposed development and that which constitutes additional mitigation.
This PEIR has been informed by comments raised by EH as part of the Scoping Responses (see below). The ‘worst case scenario’ has been applied in section 17.6 Potential Impacts.
Mitigation measures embedded within the design of East Anglia THREE and its offshore cable corridor are clearly defined in section 17.3.3.
Preliminary Environmental Information May 2014
East Anglia THREE Offshore Windfarm
Chapter 17 Offshore Archaeology Page 6
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125