ENERGY MANAGEMENT
a RO system was being used to treat the water entering clean steam humidifiers. As part of the water reduction project, the pipe work for the existing RO system was reconfigured to treat the feed water entering the steam system. The resulting increase in steam purity and heat exchange efficiency translated into a direct increase in operational efficiency. A decrease in the dissolved solids entering the system allows the boilers to operate at higher cycles, markedly reducing the make-up and chemical treatment requirements.
Optimising chemical handling This project also involved improving chemical inventory management and operator safety. Switching from the use of chemical pails to a demand delivery service eliminated unnecessary container waste without compromising adequate dosage control. The delivery of chemicals to the point of use via on site containment tanks allowed operators to participate in higher value activities such as on site water testing and online logging. Prior to this change, team members would carry pails of chemicals up three flights of stairs to the boiler room located in the penthouse. Demand delivery minimises the number of deliveries required annually, ensures
Table 1: Annual savings as a result of the water reduction project Savings after
Water Energy
Chemicals Salt
Savings after reverse
blow down control osmosis configuration 77% 4%
33% 69%
Total annual savings
77.3% 4.3% 78% 77%
$47,548
Table 2: Reduction in water consumption as a result of the water reduction project Savings after
Savings after reverse
Daily make-up (US gallons/day) Daily blow down (US gallons/day)
blow down control osmosis configuration 84.4% 92%
84.4% 99.5%
Total annual volume saved 784,192 US gallons
that there is always inventory on site and eliminates any breaks in the treatment programme resulting from low inventory.
Conclusion The water reduction project at Headwaters is a great example of how ‘greener’ healthcare operations can be
achieved from within the facility while also optimising operating costs. Since the implementation of this project, spending on water, energy and treatment chemicals has decreased by $47,548 and the hospital has received natural gas rebates for its environmental success.
IFHE
IFHEDigest Providing insights into the vast field of healthcare engineering and facility management IFHE DIGEST 2018 47
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88