This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
REGULAR


TOXICITY & BIODEGRADABILITY


In the fifth part of his investigation into the ‘Green Debate’, Max Adam, Sales & Marketing Director at RP Adam, turns his attentions to toxicity and biodegradability, examining how these two words are often misused and how this can blur understandings of the safety of cleaning products.


The chemical industry is one of the largest on earth, worth billions of dollars, covering a vast array of products including industrial treatments, coatings, paints/inks, crop protection/pesticides, fertilisers and consumer chemicals. It is logical, therefore, that with this massive production and consumption of resources, there needs to be adequate control of industry activities.


Although a company such as ours is tiny in comparison with some of the ‘Global Goliaths’ of the chemical world, each one of us has an important role to play in limiting negative environmental impact.


So far in this series we have presented an informative picture regarding the key issues surrounding cleaning


34 | Tomorrow’s Cleaning January 2016


chemicals and environmental responsibility. We now turn our attention to two important areas, toxicity and biodegradability. These are two emotive words that can often be used erroneously and, like the ‘Man Made v Natural’ debate, can get in the way of rational understanding of the safety profile of commonly used cleaning products.


TOXICITY The toxicity of cleaning chemical ingredients, whether in relation to aquatic life or to people, is not a property that some substances have and others not. In simple terms everything is toxic given a high enough dose. It is evident however, that certain substances are much more toxic than others, causing harm at much lower


dose levels. What matters most is whether the dose is high enough to cause harm.


The acute toxicity of chemical substances can be grouped into four main categories according to the concentration, or dose level, where a toxic effect can be observed or predicted. Acute toxicity categories 1, 2 and 3 apply to more dangerous chemicals, with associated hazard statements appearing on product labelling stating that the product may be ‘Fatal’ or ‘Toxic’. The phrase ‘Harmful’ is used for the less dangerous Category 4 classification.


The hazard classification assigned to a chemical cleaning product, normally a mixture of different chemical substances, is derived from protocols


twitter.com/TomoCleaning


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76