search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
21


if it is more efficient to extract all the material first, followed by separation or to use the extraction-injection technique. While further experiments are planned to elucidate this, it is quite probable that the best procedure will turn out to be application-dependent.


Acknowledgements


I wish to thank Neal Byrne of Lotus Separations LLC (Princeton, NJ) for running the LC-MS analyses.


References


Figure 11. Chromatogram of final product. CHIRALCEL OD-H 150 x 4.6 mm, 5% methanol in CO2 at 3 ml/ min, back pressure 100 bar. Injection 10µl. Detection UV at 230 nm. Oven temperature 40°C.


when the concentrations of the impurities in the injected material remain that in the original sample, the present method allows the concentration of the impurities and their elution within the first few injections. The higher concentrations also make it easier to detect and isolate minor components. Application of the technique to a natural product complicated the simple procedure by the kinetics of extraction from the organic matrix. Although some components were


rapidly extracted and eluted, other, more polar, compounds followed a much slower extraction regime which was probably controlled by lower solubility in the supercritical CO2


and diffusion from the


matrix. The major component of the cloves was isolated in good recovery and at very high purity. Thus, the method is clearly applicable to the rapid isolation of components of natural products by combining the extraction and separation into a single process. It is arguable


[1]. M Shaimi and G B Cox, Chromatography Today, November/December 2014, 7, 42.


[2] Farshad Yazdani, Morteza Mafi, Fathollah Farhadi, Kourosh Tabar-Heidar, Kioumars Aghapoor, Farshid Mohsenzadeh, and Hossein Reza Darabi Z. Naturforsch. 60b, (2005), 1197.


[3] Guan Wenqiang, Li Shufen, Yan Ruixiang, Tang Shaokun, Quan Can, Food Chemistry 101 (2007) 1558–1564


[4] Juliana M. Prado, Glaucia H.C. Prado, M. Angela A. Meireles, J. of Supercrit. Fluids, 56, (2011), 231.


[5] Helena Sovová, Chemical Engineering Science, 49, (1994), 409.


GC Preparative System VPS2800


The VPS2800 Preparative Gas Chromatograph System by GL Sciences can collect target compounds which were separated by Gas Chromatography. A highly inert and unique internal flow path is introduced with the VPS2800.


With a unique flow path


there is no absorption or contamination. Components coming from the column, passes through the manifold and are recovered in one of the preparative tubes by switching the back pressure gas. In order to prevent contamination, the VPS2800 uses a separate gas for sealing the entrance of the preparative tube that is not in use. The unique deactivation of the sample lines reduces the absorption, resulting in very precise fractions of the chromatogram.


The VPS2800 is equipped with a next-generation electronic cooling function. The Stirling cooler is a completely new cooling mechanism, it uses the intake and exhaust heat during compression and expansion of the refrigerant gas (Helium) in a closed circuit. The Stirling cooler is electrical driven and no liquid nitrogen is needed for cooling. This cooling function result in very low trapping temperatures without the need of cryogenics like LN2 For further information please visit www.glsciences.com


or CO2 .


The U-2D™ 96 Well Plate System offers users unprecedented sample management control. The patent pending design allows removal of the “Rack” containing AQ™ precision glass inserts from the plastic base. Users can see the samples in the inserts and return the rack to the base. Inserts can be removed from the rack and placed in a standard vial.


U-2D 96 WELL PLATES


The future of sample management ™


U-2D-Plates.com For more information visit


Order from:


VISUAL INSPECTION THERMAL CONTROL COMPATIBILITY


SUSTAINABILITY ORTHOGONALITY


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60