search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
4


NEWS


Managing Editor James Parker james@netmagmedia.eu


Advertisement Manager/ Joint Publisher Anthony Parker anthony@netmagmedia.eu


Production Assistants Mikey Pooley Shelley Collyer Rob Duncan Kim Musson


Editorial Assistants Roseanne Field Jack Wooler Teodora Lyubomirova


Editorial Coordinator Sue Benson


Contributors Norman Hayden Stephen Cousins


Sales Director Lesley Mayo


Sales Executives Suzanne Easter Ian Fletcher Kim Friend Steve Smith


Audience Development Manager Jane Spice


Managing Director Simon Reed


netMAG media


publishing – ver tical search


netMAGmedia Ltd Cointronic House Station Road, Heathfield East Sussex, TN21 8DF


Advertising & Administration t 01435 863500 f 01435 863897 info@netmagmedia.eu www.architectsdatafile.co.uk


Press Releases editorial@netmagmedia.eu


FROM THE EDITOR


F


ar be it from me to be a purveyor of doom and gloom, but even the most optimistic architect has to be somewhat nervy about the impending Brexit negotiations, which are likely to be conducted in secrecy despite their huge impact on all business sectors across the country.


Despite that general lack of clarity on where the Government’s mindset is as it approaches the triggering of Article 50 in March (we will be leaving the single market, but we want preferential access to it, is that right?), there has been an unwelcome recent revelation. It was very unwelcome to the Government, being a leaked document someone gave to The Times, suggesting that it might be somewhat difficult to maintain that absolute secrecy throughout a two-year negotiation.


But the annoyance in the Cabinet pales in comparison by what many in the construction industry will be feeling to as it once again is confronted by the stark reality of where the industry sits in the Government’s pecking order. For the document purports to reveal the Government’s list of priority sectors in its Brexit negotiations, which are presumably the ones it will be fighting hardest to protect, possibly with bespoke deals similar to what Nissan has secured.


And despite the recent admittance that the housing market is “broken” in the context of its ability to deliver the homes needed to stave off the housing crisis, now it seems that construction isn’t a big problem for the Government. Never mind the warnings of skills shortages and the already visible hikes in materials costs post-Brexit.


What are the ‘high priority’ sectors? Automotive and Banking – perhaps no surprises there. However, the ‘medium priority’ sectors outranking construction include Chemicals, no doubt important, but is this sector really more vulnerable than construction to the possible downsides of Brexit? And when you look carefully, it’s not even construction as a whole sitting alongside telecoms as the low priority industries in the list, but the sub-sector of ‘steel construction,’ under attack from Chinese dumping of cheap steel.


Annual subscription costs just £48 for 12 issues, including post and packing. Phone 01435 863500 for details. Individual copies of the publication are available at £5 each inc p & p. All rights reserved


No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, including photocopying, recording or stored in any information retrieval system without the express prior written consent of the publisher. Although every effort is made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of material published in Architects Datafile, the publisher can accept no responsibility for the claims or opinions made by contributors, manufacturers or advertisers. Editorial contributors to this journal may have made a payment towards the reproduction costs of material used to illustrate their products. The manufacturer of the paper used within our publication is a Chain-of- Custody certified supplier operating within environmental systems certified to both ISO 14001 and EMAS in order to ensure sustainable production. Printed in England


This view of the sector seemingly being seen as less worthy of focus has led to expressions of disbelief, and has prompted head of industry-wide body Build UK Suzannah Nichol to “appeal for calm.” However, it needs a bit more than that, and a strong voice to be heard so that the Brexit negotiators in Government understand what’s at stake.


The architectural profession certainly does – RIBA’s recent poll of 1,100 architects found that four in 10 EU- national architects in the UK have considered leaving, and over 68 per cent of those surveyed said they thought that the results of leaving the EU would not be positive for architectural practices. Surely they can’t all be doom and gloom merchants? And surely the UK needs to provide assurance to the gifted architects from the EU that enrich the profession?


Our View Point from leading firm PLP (page 14) gives a fascinating view of human resources in a practice, and although they are putting on a brave face, they are confronting the fact that there may be trouble ahead.


James Parker Editor


Cover


Bridge, west London Herzog & de Meuron gets go-ahead


for its brick pier-encased stadium, page 05


Chelsea FC stadium design, Stamford


02.17


ON THE COVER... © HERZOG & DE MEURON


T FONDACO DEI TEDESCHI, VENICE A sensitive restoration preserves a Venetian palazzo as a high-end retail destination


THE BEACON, HEMEL HEMPSTEAD Can this be the world’s greenest resi tower?


Plans for a new stadium for London’s Chelsea FC have been approved by Hammersmith & Fulham Council. For more information, go to page 05.


WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK


ADF FEBRUARY 2017


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100