search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
HERITAGE & HISTORIC BUILDINGS PROJECT REPORT


BUILDING PROJECTS


T FONDACO DEI TEDESCHI VENICE


Italian renaissance


OMA’s transformation of a former 13th century Venetian palazzo into a department store on the Grand Canal shows how sensitive architectural interventions can successfully respect a multi-layered historic structure. Stephen Cousins reports


he T Fondaco dei Tedeschi, located beside the iconic Rialto Bridge on Venice’s Grand Canal, has been referred to as the building equivalent of a historical ‘palimpsest,’ or manuscript. This is because it incorporates an array of preservation and reconstruction techniques spanning several centuries. The 9,000 m2


T building started life as a


13th Century palazzo used as a trading post for German merchants, and was twice destroyed by fires, then rebuilt in its current form in 1506.


The building was converted into a customs house in the 17th century, and significant structural changes were carried out in the 1930s, under Mussolini, to trans- form it into a post office. In 1987 it was listed as a Monument, restricting permissi- ble alterations.


Fast forward to today and the Fondaco has taken on a distinctly 21st Century guise as a high end department store, occupied by tenants DFS of Hong Kong, its many historic layers exposed to view alongside new architectural interventions and plush interiors.


The large-scale architectural additions and preservation works were carried out by Netherlands-based architects OMA, headed up by founder Rem Koolhaas and partner Ippolito Pestellini Laparelli. The internal retail vision was developed by UK-based Jamie Fobert Architects.


A key aim for the latest reworking of the Fondaco was to demystify the ‘sacred’ image of a historical building, explains Laparelli: “Historical buildings in Italy are, in the majority of cases, considered immutable monuments to be preserved free of transformation or adaptation. Our project refutes the idea of declaring one


ADF FEBRUARY 2017 WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK


35


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100