Technical
‘tighter cut’ is achieved. With the removal of lateral growth, the remaining leaves are more vertical, allowing room for new leaf growth, resulting in a tighter, denser sward. This can result in a truer, faster surface, and better surfaces mean that mowing heights can be raised, reducing stress, whilst not reducing speed. All this, without the need to add additional operations or man hours, as the groomer is an accessory to the standard cutting unit. No wonder turf groomers initially became so popular.
One drawback to the early designs was wear on the mechanism, making accurate adjustment difficult, and failure of the clutch and belt drive systems, making them expensive to maintain. Thankfully, the later versions of groomers have removed, or reduced, these issues to leave us with significantly better, more reliable units.
More recently, certain manufacturers have produced turf groomers which run in reverse (against the direction of the cutting cylinder). This is a far more aggressive cutting action and is fine if you have the growth rates to cope with it. However, careful adjustment and setting is required, as well as remembering to raise the groomer off the turf surface when growth rates will not support such aggressive operation.
Bi-Directional
The latest trend is to have a groomer which is bi-directional. With a double edged groomer blade, these units can run with the cylinder, or against it, giving real control over the aggression of the unit and the amount of material removed from the surface. Directional control with precise depth adjustment has really brought the turf groomer up to date.
Note: A turf groomer is a cutting tool and the blades need to be sharp! A blunt groomer will tear and damage your turf, just like a blunt cylinder or bottom blade. So talk to your dealer about grinding the groomer as well as the reel and, when the edges are worn away, change the groomer blades ... the difference in appearance, turf health and speed will surprise you!
Brushes
We have used brushes on greens for probably as long as we have used cylinders to cut fine turf. Raising lateral growth to the cylinder, removing debris from the surface and working in topdressing are classic reasons to use a turf brush. Brushing, much like grooming, is a mechanical maintenance process which can add to the quality of the surface, or detract from it if overdone.
The forward and reverse drive belt configuration on Jacobsen’s bi-directional brush and groomer accessory
There are a wide range of brush options on the market, from towed and mounted, fixed or powered brushes, cassette system units which replace the cutting units, fixed brushes fitted between the front roller and the cylinder, and brush alternatives to turf groomers. So, whether you want to use a brush as part of renovation, surface maintenance or daily preparation, there is a brush option that’s designed for just that.
For daily maintenance and presentation, the options are either fitting a brush between the front roller and the cylinder, (which raises laterals and stragglers for the cylinder), or a powered rotating brush. Several manufacturers now offer a brush option to their turf groomer accessories, either a brush fitted to an existing groomer shaft or replacing the original steel groomer blade assembly with a brush shaft.
With a selection of bristle stiffness, and the option to reverse the brush direction, this is a real step forward.
PC AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2015 I 141 Brush Selection
The stiffness of the brush, and the working height and aggression of the brush, all need to be carefully considered, if you are to achieve the desired results. It would be realistic perhaps to suggest using only soft bristles on fine fescues, and perhaps medium bristles for bents and most other grasses. Stiff bristle brushes can be very aggressive, which is great for removing material, (prior to overseeding or renovation programmes perhaps), or for use on more aggressive turf grasses, such as Bermuda or Zoysia, but perhaps not for general use in Northern Europe.
The danger from overuse is bruising of the leaf surface, and damaging the plant by tearing leaves from it. Certainly, aggressive brushing can be a useful part of a maintenance regime or renovation, but everyday operation should aid and assist growth, not reduce it.
The potential benefits from using a groomer unit brush are its flexibility and the control the turf manager has over the results. One setting which has produced consistently good results is to reverse the brush direction and set it at the mowing height. This will brush and lift all leaves up to the cylinder and give a very fine cut, resulting in a faster, truer playing surface. The real benefit here is that any bruising to the leaf is removed by the mower, so all that is left is perfectly cut and healthy sward. The brushing action also leaves a clearly defined stripe, so the after cut appearance is improved - providing, of course, that the cutting unit is sharp and correctly adjusted!
An old groomer blade (left) with a profile that cuts in a single direction and the new profile (right) which allows the blade to cut in both directions
Conclusions
Using either turf groomers or turf brushes can produce a better, truer and faster finish on your fine turf. However, as with all tools, it’s really about understanding what they can do for you, and using them as part of a complete management programme. Including light grooming or brushing into the daily mowing regime can assist in producing a better turf surface.
A selection of accessories showing smooth front roller, brush, grooved front roller and groomer unit
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164