This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
INNOVATIONS


LEADING MOORING LINE CALCULATION SOFTWARE


The International Association of Lighthouse Authorities (IALA) has endorsed a mooring line calculation software package, CALMAR, designed by world leading buoy manufacturer Mobilis.


The manufacturer has supplied the marine industry with robust, IALA compliant and cost-effective navigation, mooring and zone marking buoys for more than 20 years.


EXCLUSIVE DISTRIBUTOR


Mobilis, which is exclusively distributed in the UK by Hydrosphere UK Ltd, developed the sophisticated numerical catenary mooring line calculator to enable quick and easy evaluation of all the environmental forces acting on a moored buoy.


As a result, moorings have often ended up being too short when weather conditions deteriorate.


CONSIDERATION FACTORS


Based on Mobilis’ mooring calculation bank, the new IALA approved software integrates more load parameters than other calculators and takes into consideration maximum depth of water, surface wind generated current, current drag on the mooring line, drag force caused by wave height drift, increasing drag coefficient due to biological fouling on the buoy hull and chain and buoy immersion and drag increasing as the mooring load increases.


This allows for the exact equilibrium of buoy displacement, lifted catenary chain loads and horizontal drags to be calculated. “At Mobilis we have been calculating moorings using a full analysis method for more than 20 years and have not experienced a


‘THREE TIMES THE DEPTH’ RULE


Many people around the world still use ‘three times the depth’ rule, explained David Henry, Naval Architect for Mobilis. “The rule of thumb does not take into account the various drag forces exerted on the buoy and mooring by maximum site environmental conditions or the linear mass of the chain, both of which make a considerable difference to the necessary catenary length,” he said.


REEF SUBSEA BUOY MODELS


CALMAR allows users to input or use libraries of buoy models, build their own buoy model for calculation and compare the results between two different buoys or two different buoys’ mooring lines.


Hydrosphere UK Ltd 44 www.windenergynetwork.co.uk


single buoy mooring line breakage over several thousand buoy mooring specifications.”


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100