This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Technical Why Spray CDA?


Vicki Wall, Technical Manager at Spray CDA, suggests there are ten top reasons to ditch the knapsack and switch to Controlled Droplet or Ultra Low Volume Applicators


Time Savings - with CDA and ULV systems there are considerable time savings to be made. The efficient low volume chemical application reduces the need for frequent trips back to base to refill. ULV lances are capable of delivering total weed control at a rate of 2 litres per hectare, so you could spray a hectare with two fills of the tank. A 15 litre knapsack delivering 200l/ha would take more than thirteen knapsacks to spray the same area; assuming ten minutes per refill’ that’s a time saving of over two hours.


Manual Handling - reduced volume equals reduced weight; a full ULV lance weighs in at around 4kg, a full knapsack nearer 20kg. CDA and ULV give a significant reduction in manual handling and major improvements in comfort for the user.


Health and Safety - With no need to carry vast amounts of water, the operator is less


physically tired by the job and more alert to his/her surroundings, which can help with improved accuracy of application and improved safety for the operator and the environment.


Drift Reduction - CDA lances produce a controlled droplet which minimises the production of very tiny droplets which are prone to drift. The use of hoods on ULV systems, coupled with improved technology, ensures that the chemical goes exactly where it is intended, and pesticides can be applied in windier conditions than through traditional application methods.


Improved Efficacy - the small uniform droplets produced by low volume sprayers coat the target effectively and ensure maximum uptake by the weed.


Lock Up - there is no reduction in pesticide efficiency through lockup caused by high levels of lime or variances in Ph because you are not adding any water to the spray mix.


Environmental Benefits - an additional benefit to improved efficacy is to reduce the overall amount of pesticide required. Because none of your pesticide is lost by lock up, drift or poor application, the amount you need to apply can be reduced. ULV Systems can halve the amount of glyphosate applied.


50% less glyphosate means less risk to the environment and less risk to the operator.


Water Savings - no need to carry large amounts of water, saving on fuel, not to mention the cost of the water itself and standpipe hire.


SUD - low volume systems help to reduce pesticide usage, which is in line with the principles of the Sustainable Use Directive.


Significant Cost Savings - when you add up reduced operator time, reduced water costs, reduced down time due to wind and less pesticide use, it all adds up to significant savings.


www.spraycda.co.uk


PC JUNE/JULY 2014 I 125


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156