by william e. kelly
THE HISTORY OF INSERTION OF RELIGION INTO GOVERNMENT
A NATION’S JOURNEY TO THE BENEFIT OF ALL AND DETRIMENT OF NONE
We are a nation built and sustained by our cultural, political, religious and social diversity, which remains simultaneously our greatest strength and weakness. As a nation of immigrants we are not of one mind,
not guided by one conscience and certainly not bound to one religion. The phrase, “One Nation Under God,” despite previous efforts to make it so, was not a part the Pledge of Allegiance until the change in language was added in 1954. According to Wikipedia, the year before it was added, President Eisenhower had been baptized a Presbyterian. That same year, he sat in Abraham Lincoln’s pew for pas- tor George MacPherson Docherty’s sermon based on the Gettysburg Address. The pastor, said that “there was something missing in the pledge and that which is missing was the characteristic and definitive factor in the American way of life.” Pastor George convinced Eisenhower that “Lincoln’s words ‘under God’ were the “defining words that set the United States apart from other nations. The next day Eisen- hower acted on the suggestion and Representative Charles Oakman (R-Mich.), introduced a bill to that effect. Congress passed the necessary legislation and Eisenhower signed the bill into law on Flag Day, June 14, 1954.” In 1956 congress passed the act adopting “In God
We Trust” as the nation’s official motto. However, E pluribus unum (Out of many one) still appears in the national emblem of United States, on passports, official documents, the seals of the president, vice president, the House of Representatives, Senate and the Supreme Court. “In God We Trust” was also added to paper money from 1957 to 1966. Thomas Jefferson addressed the separation
of church and state, in a January 1, 1802 letter in which he wrote,
“I contemplate with sovereign
reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should ‘make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,’ thus building
58 RAGE monthly | MAY 2014
a wall of separation between church and state.” The First Amendment to our constitution was adopted in 1791 and states “Congress shall make no law respect- ing an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof...” I personally do not practice any specific religion but rather a code of conduct that comes from some
“does it follow that those who
practice aspecific religion have the right to preach orinfluence governmentto encourage civil prejudice anddiscrimination?”
inner sense of right and wrong. Grateful for my life and humbled by the very thought of my existence, my understanding of its wonders, let alone earth and the vast universe beyond, leave me in awe of just how minuscule a speck upon a speck of unimaginable smallness, each of us is. It is in that sobering light that I have peered into our nation’s historical beginnings as a democracy tolerant of differing religious convictions. Balancing human diversity and behavior in ways that
unite us as one people of common needs and causes maintains a healthy and sustainable democracy. Still, the academic questions are: Were the Decla-
ration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution devised as religious decrees to maintain the status quo or to allow for the inevitable evolution of our democracy without regard to any specific religion? Do our founding documents protect the inalien-
able rights of individuals to practice or not practice any religion? If so, does it follow that those who practice a specific religion have the right to preach or influence government to encourage civil prejudice and discrimination? Has our nation’s journey in democracy been to the benefit of all and detriment of none?
Just Think About It! Author’s note:There is not adequate time or space
to quote from author Kerby Anderson’s The Declara- tion and Constitution—Their Christian Root, but suf- fice it to say, this writing sheds light on the evolution of “In God We Trust.” I highly recommend his short but enlightening work featured
onprobe.org.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80