Horse #2
Normally we would discuss the lumbosacral gap as well, but in this case, because the photographs are misleading based on the findings from manual palpation, Horse #2 is actually weaker in his coupling. Comparing the placement of the stifle protrusion in
relation to the sheath on each horse we see that Horse #1 has a much lower stifle. That equates with a longer rear stride and more scope over fences. It also compliments his longer stride in front. Both horses show the distance from point of hip to stifle
protrusion as the longest side of the rear triangle, which equates with the ability to jump from a gallop stride and is an eventer trait. However, there is a significant difference in the rear
triangles. The ilium side (point of hip to point of buttock) and the femur side (point of buttock to stifle protrusion) are essentially equal on Horse #1, which is a jumper trait. Conversely, Horse #2 shows the femur side as the
shortest side. This particular construction changes the stride behind. The hind leg cannot reach as far underneath the body and tends to be further out behind, which not only shortens the rear stride; it limits scope. This construction and the resultant change to stride also put additional stress on the hind leg, particularly from hock down. This explains why Horse #2 has had his hocks injected twice by age 10 and why he is not likely to have a secondary career that will last until he nears 20, as is the case with Horse #1.
About Judy: Judy has researched equine conformation for 30 years and recently completed her third book on the subject, available as an e-book. She travels worldwide giving conformation clinics for all disciplines. Judy also analyzes individual horses based on photos and gives breeding consultations. Learn more at
www.jwequine.com.
Warmbloods Today 51
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68