This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
BULLY


BULLY explores the plights of five of the estimated 13 million students in the U.S. who are harassed by their classmates each year because of their sexual orientation, gender, race and/or physical appear- ance. The film gives a painful yet inspiring voice to these bullied kids and their families, so much so that its distributor—The Weinstein Company—was plan- ning to arrange screenings of Bully in middle schools and high schools across the country. This noble plan was thwarted last month,


however, when the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) slapped the documentary with an “R” (Restricted) rating, thereby limiting its viewership to those ages 17 and over unless accompanied by an adult. The MPAA felt compelled to do so because of one sequence in which a bully hatefully spews profan- ity including repeated use of the F-word. There is no sex, nudity, graphic violence or pervasive profanity in the movie but that one scene was enough for the MPAA to give its second-most restrictive classification. The Weinstein Company and the MPAA have


squared off over ratings before. Last year’s Oscar- winning historical drama The King’s Speech was similarly rated “R” for one scene in which its subject, King George VI (played by Colin Firth), lets loose with a string of expletives in an effort to overcome his crippling stutter. The studio later re-edited the film to garner a “PG-13” rating in order to allow it to be shown in schools. This time, though, The Weinstein Company challenged the MPAA’s initial rating of Bul- ly, arguing that the sequence in question necessarily


THE BATTLE OVER by chris carpenter


Bullying among children and teens, especially of those who are LGBTQ, has been a hot topic in recent years. The discussion has gotten even more heated recently thanks to a new documentary, appropriately titled Bully. It opened in Los Angeles and other major cities on March 30.


shows the ugliness of a standard bully’s attitude. Big-name celebrities including Meryl Streep,


Johnny Depp, Ellen DeGeneres, Anderson Cooper and Justin Bieber voiced their support in overturn- ing the “R” rating, as have LGBT advocacy groups such as the Human Rights Campaign, Lambda Legal and Change.org. Nearly 500,000 people signed an online petition started by a Michigan teenager, Katy Butler, who revealed she herself had been bullied, and a growing number of Democrat and Republican members of Congress were at press time calling for the MPAA to overhaul its antiquated ratings system. A March screening of Bully in Washington, DC that


was arranged to help defuse controversy over the “R” rating only added more fuel to the fire. At the event, MPAA President (and former U.S. Senator) Christopher Dodd stated “I don’t want the ratings issue to step all over what (director Lee Hirsch) has created.” The award-winning Hirsch, who was pres- ent, quickly fired back: “The R is stepping all over it; that’s the problem.” Subsequently, California State Representative Linda T. Sanchez told the press, “This is a movie that’s all about protecting kids and the fact that the MPAA would offer a rating that won’t let kids see it seems really counterintuitive.” Criticism of the MPAA for both its mysterious methods and secret membership has been growing in recent years. The 2006 documentary This Film Is Not Yet Rated incisively detailed the organization’s double standards in how it rates movies, including the way LGBT-themed and independent films are


typically deemed to have less merit than mainstream productions. Bully, which is independently produced and deals with LGBT themes, could legitimately be the latest victim of the MPAA’s time-honored applica- tion of these double standards. The unprecedented, widespread uproar over Bully might be able to pro- voke actual reform of the ratings system where past efforts to do so have failed. Meanwhile, despite an MPAA appeal panel’s


re-evaluation of the rating given Bully, the film’s “R” rating was upheld. Dodd responded, “I’m stuck; If we change the ruling in this case, I’ll have ten other film- makers lined up saying they shouldn’t be given the R, and who are we to say why this film should be differ- ent than the others?” The Weinstein Company, clearly milking the ratings controversy for all its worth in terms of publicity, ultimately announced on March 26 that it would release Bully without a rating. This is ordinarily the kiss of death for films in wide release, since most theater chains won’t show movies with- out an MPAA rating. However, Weinstein secured a pledge in advance from the nation’s largest exhibitor, AMC, to play Bully without MPAA approval. Having seen the film, I can attest that the “R” rating


is excessive and that this great, eye-opening movie should be seen by students as well as—most espe- cially—by their parents and teachers. But will it be a hit at the almighty box office? Only time will tell. In the meantime, the bullying goes on. For more information about Bully and where it is being shown, visit thebullyproject.com


APRIL 2012 | RAGE monthly 23


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76