This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
RETAIL e-FX PROVIDER


>>>


Higgins says that are a number of factors that will influence the choice of MT4 Liquidity Bridge provider. “Tese factors include latency, performance, reliability, liquidity provider integration, multi- asset support, partial and multiple fill support and excellent customer service around-the-clock.” Gold-i has attempted to address these customer concerns by offering a series of complimentary services such as Gold-i Gate Link, Gold-i Position Keeper and Gold-i Multi-MAM.


Scalability


Customisation features are also available in the latest generation of Bridging products but perhaps one of the most pressing issues is the need for Bridging products to provide the scalability needed to meet future volume growth. “Te speed of MT4 is the only real limitation in the number of transactions per second,” says Higgins. “Te Gold-i Gate Bridge is built for speed and reliability, and we have measured MT4 and the Bridge at around 500 transactions per second. In testing, over 5 million trades have been transacted in one day using a single Bridge.”


As with oneZero, Higgins recognises that white


labelling options and hosted service models are becoming an increasingly common feature in the MT4 Liquidity Bridging market. “Te Gold-i Gate Bridge fully supports introducing brokers and white labels,” says Higgins. “Te two can be grouped into separate liquidity groups and routed to either the same liquidity provider in different LP accounts or different liquidity providers. Gold-i does not offer its own white labels as that would compete with our own clients, however we partner with many brokers who offer white labels solutions using our products.”


Leverate is another broker solutions provider offering an MT4 Liquidity Bridging product. Leverate has developed its own risk management solution allowing brokers to either keep the risk on their own books or pass it straight through via STP to the best bid/ offer of a multi liquidity,” says director Lior Shmuely. “Te risk management platform is a smart strategy


154 | october 2011 e-FOREX


centre allowing the broker to decide how to STP the trades or alternatively keep the risk whilst checking the validity of the trade. Tere is a consistent demand to accept and pass high frequency trades via STP or checking the validity of the trades with logical rules for managing the risk and exposure, this is one of the reasons that the Leverate risk management system was indeed developed.”


ECN trade execution


Shmuely has also recognised that an increasing number of brokers are looking to reduce their market risk by offering ECN trade execution for their high volume clients. “Brokers have realised lately that pure B Book management may not be an optimum way to handle their risk, because of the growing number of accounts that have been successful as scalpers, robots and so on. It is for this purpose that the multiple liquidity risk management system that Leverate offers is such a popular solution.”


Divisa Capital is a broker specialising in e-trading and direct market access and with a focus on margin spot FX trading. According to chief executive Michael Markarian, the company chief executive,


the increasing trade volumes generated by high frequency, automated, mobile and algorithmic traders is having a profound impact on the back office and risk management operations of Retail FX brokers, many of whom demand ultra low latency and 100% availability. “Now more then ever, brokers need to be using the proper tools to not only manage market risk but to also process the multitude of messages that most automated strategies generate. IT infrastructure, from the servers to the data centres, also need to be scrutinised.”


Markarian agrees that an increasing number of brokers are looking to employ STP and ECN-based execution as a way of reducing the market risk that comes from their high frequency trading clients. “With increasing volatility and trade volumes, many larger brokers have enough scale required to STP their order flow in order to generate consistent revenues. Tis coupled with the fact that risk dramatically increases as do your fixed overhead costs when employing a dealing desk model.”


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196