This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
actionalert Opinion Editorial


Dietary Supplement Industry at Risk


by Jonathan Emord, Esq.


The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is poised to remove 20 to 30 percent of existing food supplement companies from the market, force a rise in prices and eliminate the availability of most, if not all, herbal supplements.


T


he most basic of hu- man rights


is that of self-


government over our own bodies, especial- ly regarding individ- ual choice over what nutrients to ingest and treatments to receive to sustain optimal health. Today, federal and state regulatory agencies constrict those rights


by limiting our choices. Those restrictions on freedom are destined to continue.


Recent examples include state dietitian licensing bills, global censor- ship of health information, and the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA; S. 510/HR 2751). Dietitian licens- ing bills designate those licensed by the American Dietetic Association as nutritionists and the sole dispensers of nutritional advice and recommenda- tions. Global censorship of nutrient-re- lated disease treatment information by all Western governments that regulate drugs works to preserve a monopoly on therapeutic claims for drug compa- nies. The Food Safety Modernization Act requires that all companies that make food and dietary supplements


28 Collier/Lee Counties swfl.naturalawakeningsmag.com


be registered with the federal government for the first time, deprives those


companies of access to the courts in favor of administrative tribunals, and forces those companies to pay for mandatory federal investigations. With passage of FSMA, which made every food and dietary supplement


company operating


in the United States subject to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) licens- ing, the regulators’ decades-old dream of ridding the market of supplements and leaving the field to FDA-approved drugs is closer to realization than ever before. The FSMA comes atop aggres- sive FDA implementation of new and costly current good manufacturing practice (cGMP) regulations, posi- tioning the agency to regulate every aspect of supplement production. Will the public awaken to the threat and compel the FDA to back down, or will the agency succeed in eliminating safe supplement products, to the detriment of the consuming public?


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64