This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
The Attorney's Office Tools


Committee determined that the domain name was improper. Interestingly, the Committee did not discuss the propriety of the suffix “.us.” Te Ohio Supreme Court declared that a URL suffix like “.org” is misleading and in violation of that state’s ethics rules.21 Finally, a few words about websites and Internet services


that offer to put lawyers in touch with persons seeking representation. As there are a variety of such “matching” services, each with its own set of ethical issues, it is beyond the scope of this article to address each of them. Perhaps if suffices to say that any decision to use such service should be predicated on a full understanding of the sometimes subtle (and sometimes blatant) ethical implications. Te attorney is personally responsible for compliance with the provisions of the advertising Rules. Rule 7.2 (f ) invokes this responsibility not only for the lawyer’s own advertisement but when he or she is a “participant in an advertising group or lawyer referral service or other program involving communications concerning the lawyer’s services.” Tose who help create the websites, “matching” services, and the accoutrements of Internet advertising are not subject to the Rules unless, of course, they are lawyers. Each Internet advertisement must contain the name of an attorney responsible for its content.22 It is that attorney (and the members of that attorney’s firm) who must answer for any ethical lapses. 


Biography Glenn Grossman have served on the


Deputy Bar Counsel of Maryland's Attorney Grievance Commission since 1996. He is responsible for evaluation and prosecution of attorney disciplinary cases and supervising Assistant Bar Counsel. Mr. Grossman has taught Professional Responsibility


as Adjunct Professor of Law at Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America as well as University of Baltimore School of Law. He has also lectured on Professional Responsibility, professionalism and risk management at University of Maryland School of Law, MICPEL, many State, local and specialty Bar Associations and Inns of Court. He has authored several articles, appearing in the


Maryland Bar Journal and other publications. In 2007 he was the recipient of the Maryland Bar


Foundation's Professional Legal Excellence Award for the Advancement of Professional Competence.


Thank You


Sustaining Members


Maria Apostolaros Richard Lundin


Patricia Cresta-Savage Lindley M. Cowperthwait Wm. Bruce Hemphill Timothy J. Hogan Michael J. Jacobs Darren Margolis Franklin J. Muher Terry A. Myers Stephen J. Nolan


MAJ


Edward L. Norwind Patricia F. O’Connor


Legislative Contributors


Matthew Paavola L. William Proctor, Jr. Peter Scherr Gary Segal Robert Stahl, IV Jeffrey Stravisky Jeffrey Tabb William Turc, Sr.


thanks members who gave over- and-above their annual dues


either by becoming a Sustaining member or by making a special Legislative Contribution. Tese options appear on the annual dues invoice and on the membership application.


Sustaining members pay twice their annual dues to help subsidize reduced rates for Young Lawyers and Law Students.


21 Jill Schachner Chanen,Watch What You Say: Regulators Still Take Ethics Rules on Lawyer Marketing Seriously, So Practitioners Should, Too, 91 A.B.A.J. 58 (October, 2005).


22 Rule 7.2 (d).


Legislative contributors help MAJ pay for expenses associated with political activities that are not direct campaign contributions to candidates.


March 1, 2010 Trial Reporter / Spring 2010 19


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76