Investment needed in football pitches is measured in billions of pounds. The FA’s recent commitment to the cause looks sadly wanting, reports Corinne Hitching
Nurturing the roots of football ... SWEET FA! L
ocal football clubs up and down the land could be heard cheering when Arsenal boss Arsène Wenger complained about the state of Wigan Athletic’s football pitch when his team lost to them back in March. This time it couldn’t be put down to just sour grapes as the pitch had played host to a rugby match just the week before, leaving it in an appalling condition and justifying Wenger’s objections. For thousands of club players, that same complaint is repeated week after week as teams struggle to play on pitches littered with pockmarks, divots and muddy patches. Poorly maintained pitches mean injuries are common and the idea of playing in a mudbath leaves many youngsters disenchanted with a game they will desert after they reach 16 years of age. By the Football Association’s own calculations in 2000, a staggering £2.2bn was needed to repair existing playing fields. But that was then. The FA now estimate that no less than £5bn must be ploughed into pitches to raise them to a state matching that of our European neighbours. “That, sadly, is the state of facilities
here,” states Nigel Hargreaves, the FA’s head of strategic development. “Significant money has been spent via the Football Foundation but we are scratching the surface, and need to invest a lot more.”
Despite that comment, when the FA
recently announced a £200m investment in grassroots football over the next four years, no extra money had been earmarked to go towards improving the state of our pitches. Instead, the money is earmarked:
1. To grow and retain participation
2. To raise standards and address abusive behaviour
3. To develop better players
4. To run the game effectively. Supporting these four goals are two other key areas of focus - a skilled workforce and improved facilities,
which simply means continuing to put £15m into the Football Foundation, a pledge they made when setting up the Foundation in 2000. The FA may have reportedly described the pitches on which most people play football as either ‘poor’ or ‘awful’ but, while Premiership players’ fees continue to rise and more money is being poured into retaining and recruiting more referees, the standard of public playing fields on which most of us play the game remains dismal. In the FA’s own document - ‘The National Game Strategy’ - in which the Association announced its grand plan for the game, it was refreshingly honest about the scale of the task ahead. “We must improve the quality, quantity and accessibility of training and playing facilities. As the game grows, a greater number of facilities may be required to sustain and increase participation in football. We need to invest in new and improved facilities in schools, clubs and on local authority sites to deliver this National Game Strategy.”
Where is the funding coming from? The FA goes on to list its ‘Challenges’:
• Improving the quality of an access to existing facilities to support grassroots football
• Understanding what is needed to meet the demand for quality facilities in every local authority area
• Addressing increasing costs to clubs of hiring facilities for training and playing matches
• Campaigning against the loss of playing fields
All fine words, as is the pledge to ‘develop 150 artificial grass pitches to FIFA and FA standards to increase opportunities for coaching, leagues, competitions and more flexible football formats.’ But what is needed is a seismic shift in the scale of investment. Football is big business - currently 1.5 million people take to the playing fields in England every week and 470,000 children between 5-15 years old play for clubs, with another 3.4
million playing ‘kickabout’ football. Despite this huge grassroots participation, football faces a clutch of major challenges, including the fact that thousands of kids between of ages of 16 and 20 drop out of the game and that there is a distinct lack of qualified match officials, largely due to abuse. For these reasons, the FA intended its £200m investment to concentrate efforts on developing the game through improved infrastructure, courses, coaches, more and improved referees and increasing the number of skilled players. Much of this money will be fed into the county football associations to enable them to lead and develop the game locally. But the prospects of more cash for
grounds care remain bleak. “I am not aware of any more funds becoming available for pitch care than is already available through the Football Foundation,” says Kevin Tharme, county development manager for the Sussex Football Association. “We are provided with a budget by the FA that we use to help set up new clubs and, as a result of the new investment, we have also received some funding for new people, including a referee development officer.” All counties across the country were encouraged to create a blueprint for the next four years and the Kent Football Association was one of the first to set out their own strategy for tapping into the available funds. The strategy was prepared to ensure the county stood a chance of gaining much-needed funds to improve pitches, ensure grounds have changing rooms, retain referees and to prevent the decline of 11 versus 11 football.
Barry Bright, chairman of the Kent
FA, says: “Kent FA’s strategy really interlinks with the FA’s and that is clear to see the issues such as respect, facility improvements and referee recruitment are all part of it. We purposefully went before them in relation to the Thames Gateway development as we will be looking for additional funding to ensure there are sports facilities available there. We need to ensure we can get local authorities to tap into this money and make sure Kent gets its fair
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108