<1=>;?"#!,@!1>=",?A!;<
151
The unique Waterloo medal to Captain Stephen Holmes, 78th Foot, late 24th Foot, with which regiment he greatly
distinguished himself in leading the storming party in the successful assault of the main breach at Burgos in October
1812
WATERLOO 1815 (Captain Stephen Holmes, 78th Foot) fitted with original steel clip and ring suspension, the obverse with
light contact marks, very fine, the reverse nearly extremely fine and unique to an officer in this regiment £6000-8000
The only Waterloo Medal issued to an officer in the 78th Foot.
Captain Stephen Holmes served in the Peninsula and led a Forlorn Hope at the siege of Burgos in 1812. He was Major of Brigade in the
Waterloo campaign under Major-General Johnston. He was appointed a Knight of Hanover (K.H.) in 1832 and as a Lieutenant-Colonel
received the appointment of Deputy Inspector General of the Irish Constabulary in 1838. He died on 19 December 1839.
Holmes served in the 24th Foot throughout the war in the Peninsula and came to prominent notice for his deeds at the siege of Burgos:
On the afternoon of the 4th October 1812, the 2nd Battalion 24th Foot, were marched into the trenches, where they were formed into
two storming parties. One hundred and forty men were detailed for the assault on the main breach, led by Lieutenant Stephen Holmes,
whilst the second party, comprising 58 men led by Lieutenant Fraser, were detailed to assault the breach expected to be made by the
mine. The attack was to be delivered in daylight and many officers of other regiments managed to find their way to the hill to witness
the assault, Wellington himself being present on San Miguel.
At 5 p.m. the signal for the explosion was given by Colonel Jones, the engineer in charge, afterwards the historian of Wellington’s
sieges. He was hit in the act of giving the signal, but the mine went off and simultaneously the 24th dashed forward. The party who
made for the new breach made by the mine, led by Lieutenant John Fraser, were there so soon that many were hit by falling stones, and
all were covered by dust and fragments. This did not stop them, and before the surprised enemy could offer much resistance they were
up and over the breach. Many defenders had been killed and directly Captain Lepper and the supports joined Lieutenant Fraser’s
stormers the breach was secured and the attackers started to consolidate. The main body had a harder task: they had farther to go and
here the defenders had not been shaken by the explosion. But, headed by Lieutenant Holmes, the 24th dashed forward and though
received with a hot fire swarmed up the breach, where a savage struggle followed.
The 24th maintained themselves in the captured position until nightfall, when they were relieved. On reaching their camp they found it
thronged with officers who had come to offer their congratulations. Carried out in full view of a large concourse, the storm had caught
the imagination of the army and won the battalion great renown. The storm had cost the 24th twelve men killed, and two officers,
Coote and Stack, and 56 men wounded. Wellington himself wrote warmly of the 24th, whose conduct he described to Lord Bathurst as
‘highly praiseworthy’, while he wrote a special letter to the Duke of York to recommend to H.R.H.’s ‘favour and protection’ Captain
Hedderwick and Lieutenants Holmes and Fraser, who had so greatly distinguished themselves.
On the recommendation of Lord Wellington, Holmes was promoted to be a Captain in the 8th West India Regiment and Fraser was
promoted to be a Captain in the 1st Ceylon Light Infantry, both promotions gained in recognition of their gallant services at Burgos.
Further details of Colonel Holmes’ career are extracted from his obituary in the Untied Services Journal (1840):
‘Dec. 19th (1840), in Dublin, Lieut.-Colonel Stephen Holmes, K.H., Unattached, Deputy Inspector-General of Constabulary in Ireland.
This lamented officer entered the service as Ensign in the 6th Garrison Battalion, in 1806, and successfully obtained the appointments
of Lieutenant and Adjutant in the same corps. In the latter end of 1809 he was transferred to the 24th Regiment, then in Portugal, which
he joined in the month of February following, and in which Regiment he served during the whole of the campaigns of 1810, 1811, and
1812, having been present at the battles of Busaco, Fuentes d’Onor, Salamanca, and some minor affairs, as well as the sieges of Ciudad
Rodrigo and Burgos. At the latter fortress, he volunteered to lead the storming party, which succeeded in the assault of the main breech
on the 4th Oct. 1812, and of his conduct on this occasion, his Grace the Duke of Wellington was pleased, in his dispatch to Lord
Bathurst, to express his approbation, in consequence of which he obtained his promotion to a Company in the 8th W.I. Regiment,
which, however, he never joined. In the course of the foregoing service he acted as Brigade Major to the Brigades of the Line in the 1st
and 7th Divisions under the command of Major-Generals the Hon. Sir Edward Stopford and Sir Edward Barnes.
In February, 1814, Captain Holmes was transferred from the 8th W.I. Regiment to the 78th, and immediately joined the 2nd Battalion
(then employed in the blockade of Antwerp), which formed part of the Army in Flanders under Lord Lynedoch, and continued to serve
with his Regiment until appointed Brigade Major to Major-General Mackenzie’s Brigade. The Brigade broken up, he was removed to
that of Sir Frederick Adam, and subsequently to Major-General Johnston’s, in the 6th Division, in which latter he served during the
campaign of 1815, but owing to its not being brought into action at Waterloo, he lost the chance of the promotion, which, we believe,
was obtained by every Brigade-Major whose Brigade was engaged on that day.
www.dnw.co.uk
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176