This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
BIOTECHNOLOGY 51


D NEWIMENSION A


Biology is not fl at, so one expert in the sector is aiming to make 3D cell culture a commodity, explains Angel Garcia Martin


P


harma companies realise that most of the pre-clinical testing they


have been doing just isn’t good enough. As many as 9 in 10 drug candidates fail in clinical testing, and the majority of this attrition is due to toxicity and effi cacy issues. T is suggests that the translational tools currently used for predicting effi cacy and clinical response are not optimal. Pharma is reviving the ‘fail fast, fail cheap’ philosophy it used to try to improve pre- clinical and clinical testing outcomes in the setting of early- stage R&D and screening. Cells grown in the bottom of plastic plates as monolayer, 2D cell cultures have very diff erent expression patterns of genes, proteins and potential drug targets compared to what


those cells would be expressing in the body. In 2D culture, the cells are not exposed to the same mechanical infl uences, external signals or rates of diff usion, which can all aff ect gene expression. T ese factors can be simulated in 3D microtumours, such as switching from 2D to 3D cell models, and adopting more advanced testing methods earlier in the research workfl ow. Almost all the drug screening


eff orts carried out currently for discovering novel anti-cancer compounds rely on in vitro immortalised cancer cell line models grown in 2D, which have demonstrated a poor success in predicting clinical effi cacy, resulting in an alarming 95% failure after clinical testing, representing a waste of precious resources and time.


Over the past year-and-


a-half, we have seen a trend toward pharma wanting to model physiologically relevant tumour phenotypes to screen compounds. Biology is not fl at: cells, tissues, organs, even tumours, live in a 3D environment, thus it is desirable to test for novel compounds in systems that recreate the architecture and behaviour of cells in their natural 3D environment to understand how those compounds would behave in the natural setting. Pharma needs 3D tissue models that will better allow it to predict more accurately how a compound will function in humans. T e convenience,


availability and homogeneity of conventional continuous cell line models used for


www.scientistlive.com


Models that better recapitulate the physiological features of human tumours are a step towards rational drug development


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76