This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Pelletizers | machinery


Perfecting your pellets


A well cut pellet is important for many reasons. Prime among these is performance. A consistent pellet means a more consistent bulk density, which pays off for processors in terms of smoother feeding and more even melting. However, consistency in pellet size and shape also conveys an impression of quality. “Appearance is everything,” according to Chris Case,


vice-president of market development at Reduction Engineering Scheer (recently acquired by Dover subsidi- ary Maag). “You could have a perfectly compounded product, but if the Gaylord [bulk container] is full of mis- shapen pellets or fi nes, your customer will judge it as unacceptable.” Obtaining a good pellet cut demands the use of


well-maintained cutting equipment and the selection of the correct settings for the polymer. Variables such as temperature and heat-transfer rate affect pellet quality. “Compounders should apply statistical process control to the pelletizing step, just as they do for the compound- ing processes upstream of pelletizing,” suggests Case. The two basic types of pelletizers - strand and


die-face - each provide specifi c advantages and disadvantages. Strand pelletizers are easy to use, maintain and change over but require manual handling of strands and have a larger footprint, while die-face pelletizers are typically more highly automated, closed systems and offer a smaller footprint. Throughput, cost, and uptime are also important considerations when in choosing the best technology for a particular situation.


Strand developments Reduction Engineering Scheer says that replacing the strand pelletizer water bath with a waterslide – a combination of a trough with a water spray system – is proving a popular option today. Advantages include more effective cooling, greater options for changing the cooling variables (by using the sprayers and a tempera-


www.compoundingworld.com


Perfectly cut pellets help processors maintain consistency in part


production. Jennifer Markarian looks at some of the latest


innovations in pelletizing technology


ture-control system), reduced overall length of the cooling system, and semi-automated feeding of strands into the cutter, says Case. Another option that is gaining ground is the use of a


strand conveyor, which is placed between the waterslide and the cutter. “If you are running multiple polymer types that need different cooling rates, the conveyor gives you more room for this variation,” explains Case. A strand pelletizing technology variation that has


been available for a few years is Reduction Engineering Scheer’s cooling conveyor, which uses a stainless-steel or plastic mesh belt to carry strands while water is sprayed on them. Most recently, the company intro- duced a cooling conveyor designed for cooling very hydroscopic materials, such as bio-based plastics and highly fi lled metal compounds (certain polymers used in the medical industry that could be water soluble are also well-suited for this design). The conveyor belt employs a thin sheet of solid


stainless steel to carry the strand while cool water under the belt provides the majority of the cooling capability by transfer of heat through the thin layer of metal. Fans placed over the conveyor bring the temperature down an additional few degrees, explains sales manager John Sly, who says a few lines are already in commercial use.


January 2016 | COMPOUNDING WORLD 29





Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84