This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
»


SEPARATIONS AND PURIFICATIONS


»


Enhancing Efficiency of Trace Metals Analysis using a Validated Generic


ICP-OES Method


Ila Patel, C.J. Venkatramani, Colin D. Medley, Kavita Mistry, Larry Wigman, and Nik Chetwyn


Genentech, Inc. Small Molecule Pharmaceutical Sciences Small Molecule Analytical Chemistry and Quality Control


Abstract


Catalysts are commonly used in the pharmaceutical industry for the synthesis of active pharmaceutical ingredient (APIs).


Effective


removal of catalysts and trace metals is critical in ensuring patient safety. Regulatory agencies around the world mandate that the pharmaceutical industry must monitor and limit the levels of trace metals in pharmaceutical products. Trace metals are often analyzed using spectroscopic techniques such as inductively coupled plasma (ICP) spectroscopy. Developing and validating analytical methods for APIs is often time-consuming. While outsourcing is an option, it is expensive and requires the oversight of contract labs to ensure data quality.


The objective of this study is to enhance the efficiency of


trace metal analysis by developing a platform technology to address multiple project needs. Universal methods reduce the time and cost associated with method development and validation specifically for every individual project. This paper outlines the validation strategies on aqueous matrices. A generic ICP method was successfully developed and validated for 9 elements commonly used in API synthesis: nickel, copper, zinc, iron, magnesium, tin, palladium, platinum, and ruthenium. This study has significant bearing on other industries as well as the pharmaceutical industry.


Introduction


Submitted: 12/12/2014 Accepted for Publication: 02/10/2015


Patel I, Venkatramani CJ, Medley CD, Mistry K, Wigman L, Chetwyn N. Enhancing Efficiency of Trace Metals Analysis using a Validated Generic ICP-OES Method. Am Pharm Rev. 2015;18(1):36-43.


The presence of residual metallic impurities is an issue of increasing importance and concern to regulatory agencies around the word to ensure patients’ safety. Several common metals such as cadmium, lead, mercury, and arsenic are known to impact human health negatively, and agencies have set strict exposure limits to minimize exposure to humans.1,2


In addition, toxicological data have also led regulatory


agencies to limit the exposure levels of other metallic impurities used in active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) manufacturing. Metal- catalyzed reactions are standard practice in the modern-day API manufacturing industry. Metals are extensively used in cross-coupling reactions including palladium-catalyzed Suzuki reactions and copper- catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloadditions to enable C–C bond formation under mild conditions. Metallic impurities could originate from multiple sources including catalysts; raw materials; glassware; reactors; and equipment used in the storage and handling of starting materials, intermediates, and reagents at different stages of API synthesis.


The detection of residual metals in APIs has evolved considerably in the past century since USP <231> was first issued.


The USP


colorimetric method for heavy metals is sensitive for few metals of concern. However, this method lacks sensitivity and specificity for


36 | | January/February 2015


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76