This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Main image: © Twindesign | Dreamstime.com


SPONSORED BY:


maintain “intense involvement with social media” in order to have a voice in young people’s preferred channels of communication. So what’s new? Universities have long engaged with prospective and current students and alumni through Facebook, Twit er and LinkedIn – according to theunipod rankings, the University of Oxford enjoys three Twit er followers for every one of its current students. What’s new is the debate about the


A


value of social media for education. Answering a poll with a tweet might be more fun than put ing your hand up, for example, and having a debate on a Facebook group might feel more current than a conference call. But is that a reason to use it, and to encourage its use? Surely education is all about that relationship between tutor and student, student and peer. The long hours in the lab or library, absorbing information and being inspired to try new things. The evidence for or against using


social media for learning is as yet fairly weak with most research showing that while there is not a necessarily positive eff ect, web 2.0 can prove useful and at worst, won’t hurt. However, there are emerging voices of real enthusiasm. Take the research of Rey Junco, associate professor of education at Iowa State University, which shows that, “If students talk about a class topic on social media not traditional educational platforms like Blackboard, their discussions in class become richer.” His work is supported by a number of other studies that show the benefi ts of encouraging conversation on social media outside the classroom. Given the limited education research,


it’s wise to source evidence from elsewhere – from fi elds like media and psychology for example, where it’s been shown that online social network users are three times more likely to trust their peers’ opinions over advertising when making decisions (Juniper Research 2007). Taken in an education context, that could translate as considerable opportunities for peer-to-peer learning. In fact the HEA report, which surveyed six institutions, found that “potential students frequently used social media sites to obtain more information about universities and courses, ignoring (it was widely believed) offi cial sources of information.” Building on this work, it’s clear that


ccording to recent research published by the Higher Education Academy, universities need to


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86