COMMISSIONING
Dr Marc Rowland
Dr Marc Rowland has been a practising GP for 34 years and is based in Lewisham, where he is a partner of the Jenner Practice and where he chairs the CCG. He was formerly the co-chair of the neighbourhood practice based commissioning group and vice-chair of the Lewisham Federation.
Peter Kohn, director of the Office of London CCGs, said: “We are delighted that a GP leader of Dr Rowland’s experience has stepped forward to lead London CCGs onto their next stage of development. The next two years will see London CCGs’ responsibilities for commissioning extending and maturing and clear clinical leadership will be essential to progress.”
implementation beginning in March 2015.
On 10 November, NHS England published ‘Next steps towards primary care co-commissioning’, and its board meeting at the beginning of the month clarified concerns about conflicts of interest, the risks of which are dramatically higher when commissioning primary care compared to other services. To tackle this, the CCG decision-making committees will have a lay, not clinical, majority, and a lay chair.
Dr Rowland said: “Everyone is interested in co- commissioning, but it’s a question of the detail of it and how it works. There is this concept of linking funding together so that it’s much easier to co-ordinate funding and inputs, rather than having separate budgets – but it’s the detail people want to know about.”
London Councils intervened in the debate at the beginning of October, suggesting that local authorities should be able to approve co- commissioning arrangements and that health and wellbeing boards should play a “key role”.
Dr Rowland said he saw the content of the letter from London Councils chair Cllr Jules Pipe to NHS England chief executive Simon Stevens.
Although he could not comment specifically on London Councils’ proposals, Dr Rowland told NHE: “I did see that. I can speak locally, in my capacity as chair of Lewisham CCG; we work very closely with the council, as do CCGs across
London. There’s variation in the degree of close working between them all, but in general it’s in our interests to get on, and we have shared desires to improve the health of our population. We each provide very important planks and supports to do that.”
It’s important to avoid conflicts of interest, Dr Rowland said – but also to deal with issues maturely and not be “petty” and start treating everything as a conflict of interest.
“But equally, this is large amounts of public money being dealt with, and we must be as transparent as possible.
“I can’t speak for other parts of the country, where I think there has been much more potential for conflict of interest.”
Pressures
Financial pressures are a theme across the NHS, for commissioners as well as providers. But Dr Rowland thinks that “we’re at an absolute tipping point” in terms of change (he dislikes the over-used word ‘transformation’).
“Talking to people and listening everywhere I go, there is a fantastic will and desire to push on with changes to healthcare and in social care. It’s just a question of whether we can manage to achieve that, because if we can, then the funding problems become less intense. There seems to me to be an agreement – and Simon
Stevens has talked about this – that we’ll have to put some funding in to make it work. It’s difficult to see how we’d be able to make all the changes we want to make within our present funding envelopes.”
But cutting into the projected multi-billion pound overspend by 2020 cannot be done “the way things are now”, he said.
Clinical commissioning – 18 months on from the formal transition – is “working very well”, he said.
“I wanted to do a lot of change back in the 1990s and set up a project with the King’s Fund [trying to set up a locality-based primary care service] – which basically failed because I was completely naïve and it was the wrong time.
“PCTs I never felt were terribly primary- care orientated. I did feel they were much more secondary-care orientated and I wasn’t particularly involved – I worked at a slight distance with them, but was not directly on the board.
“The changes now feel much more positive. Having clinicians involved is very good. Could we have achieved that in a different way, by altering the PCT structure? Possibly we could have, but this is the way it’s gone. We aren’t politicians, and we don’t make those choices.
“I speak particularly for Lewisham, but from what I hear from right across London,
clinical
commissioning seems to be working very well. NHS England has adjusted to these changes very well and I feel very positive about it.”
Dr Marc Rowland
FOR MORE INFORMATION W:
www.officelondonccgs.org.uk
national health executive Nov/Dec 14 | 39
© Luc Mercells
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100