COMMENT
Mind the gap: the NHS funding question
Dr Janet Harrison, director of MSc Healthcare Management and Governance Centre for Information Management at the School of Business and Economics, Loughborough University, explores the role of training and development in tackling the NHS funding gap.
T
he general election planned for May 2015 has kicked the NHS back – as usual
and once again – into the political spotlight. Plans for changes to the NHS have been on all the political parties’ minds and voiced in conferences these past few months.
There are various causes attributed to the need for changes in the NHS: the recent disasters and terrible events that have unfolded in Mid Staff ordshire resulting in a public inquiry and the publication of a report by Robert Francis QC, and the subsequent review by Sir Bruce Keogh, ‘Review into the quality of care and treatment provided by 14 hospital trusts in England’ (2013); the demographic problems of an ageing population – the NHS now looks after more pensioners than children; we have a growing population – there will be three million more people in England by the end of the decade; disease challenges – obesity, dementia, and multimorbidity continue to aff ect more and more of the population; more expansive and more expensive treatments are being developed and patients wish to be treated by the best available treatments.
It is acknowledged by all political parties that both social and health care are bound inextricably together in these challenges.
The core of the statements and visions emerging from the political parties and the analysis of the NHS on which they are all agreed that is that there is a massive funding gap on the way for the NHS, which will impact on services, clinicians, managers and patients alike. The size of the funding gap varies in magnitude, depending on who is telling the tale. This does not make very comfortable reading for managers and clinicians in the NHS running the service for today and
planning future delivery of services – or indeed the general public.
However, it must be said that the NHS is not ignoring these looming and doom- laden challenges; quite the contrary. In a recent speech at the NHS Confederation annual conference, Simon Stevens, CEO of NHS England, gave a fi gure of £30bn as the potential funding gap and acknowledged that the NHS had been operating for the past fi ve years with a fl at rate of funding. He suggested ways forward against the backdrop of multiple, fundamental, long-range health challenges to be targeted in three distinct themes: ‘NHS Commissioning for outcomes and values’, ‘Redesigning care models’ and ‘Harnessing the coming innovations in modern medicine’.
Following and delivering these messages at trust level is the all-important aspect for change and development to be successful and meaningful. On refl ection, these three themes can be interpreted and mapped successfully on the fi ve areas for improvement in the 14 trusts from the 2013 Keogh report.
For theme one, ‘NHS Commissioning for outcomes and values’, the areas that map onto this theme are: Clinical and operational eff ectiveness; Patient experiences including patient’s views,
patient experience data
and visibility of feedback; and Safety – understanding the trust’s safety record and improving safety performance.
For theme two, ‘Redesigning care models’, the areas that map onto this theme are: Clinical and operational eff ectiveness, examining how the trust uses mortality data to analyse and improve quality of care; Workforce – it is essential that trusts listen to the views of staff .
For theme three, ‘Harnessing the coming innovations in modern medicine’, the areas that map onto this theme are: Governance and leadership and all of the areas for improvement given in the Keogh report. Depending on the fi tness of the trust, these themes may well act as a model for all NHS trusts.
It remains the case that despite new models and suggestions for meeting the multiple health challenges facing the NHS in England, new money for the NHS has not been carefully articulated by any of the political parties yet.
Meanwhile the current coalition government has agreed to award £55 per patient to GPs for a diagnosis of dementia. In very crude terms this policy move does not fi t with the massive funding gap scenario and has not gone down well with the general public and secondary care healthcare workers.
Clearly and carefully working out how to meet the new challenges for the NHS are tasks for all managers and clinicians in the NHS. When and how to rationalise the care are still the orders of the day. Equipping the workforce with more than common sense and a love of the NHS is essential, therefore
education
and training should be paramount in all trusts thinking and planning for the future to avoid falling into the gap.
FOR MORE INFORMATION
W:
www.lboro.ac.uk/study/postgraduate/ programmes/departments/business- economics/healthcare-management- governance/
national health executive Nov/Dec 14 | 23
Dr Janet Harrison
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100