This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
COMMISSIONING XXXX


Thirty-two CCGs – one voice


GP Dr Marc Rowland, who chairs Lewisham CCG, has just been appointed chair of the London Clinical Commissioning Council too, which represents all 32 CCGs in the capital. NHE spoke to him to find out his plans in the role.


L


ondon’s clinical commissioning groups are going in the same direction – but at different speeds.


That’s the conclusion of Dr Marc Rowland, who on 1 October took over as chair of the London Clinical Commissioning Council (LCCC).


Dr Rowland, already chair of the Lewisham CCG, noted the huge diversity among London’s 32 boroughs and thus the different challenges faced by the various CCGs.


The LCCC’s role is a co-ordinating one, taking in the views of the individual CCGs and reflecting them back to each other and to NHS England, and acting as a single point of contact and – where appropriate – as a single voice.


For example, on the day NHE spoke to Dr Rowland, he had been at the launch of the London Health Commission’s report, ‘Better Health for London’, with Boris Johnson and Lord Darzi.


The LCCC published its own statement on the proposals, welcoming the “practical steps” and “clear aspirations” in that far-reaching report into public health measures on behalf of all the


London CCGs – each of which is also free to act on its own and issue its own response.


The CCGs’ longer-term responses and actions following that report will be a key focus for the LCCC in the coming years.


Projects


Other recent and ongoing work programmes tackled by the LCCC have included an ‘acuity project’ looking into the four-hour A&E target across London and better planning for winter 2014-15; improving collaborative commissioning across contracts with providers; reviewing the London levies; enhancing the relationship between the LCCC and London Clinical Senate; and working even more closely with NHS England’s London team, the mayor’s office and London Councils.


One of the key projects has been general practice development. The LCCC provided project managers to groups of GP practices that were considering federating together, four of which were ultimately chosen. Two of these potential federations are large (more than 20 practices each) and two are medium-


sized of fewer than 10 practices each. The Open University is analysing the outcomes of these projects.


Dr Clare Gerada, clinical chair of the Primary Care Transformation Programme for the London region, and immediate past chair of the Royal College of GPs, has said that GP federations are the “first real step to integration”.


It is an important issue for Dr Rowland too, who told us: “My predecessor [Howard Freeman] has done a lot of work in helping to facilitate that and co-ordinating information with Peter Kohn, director of the Office of London CCGs.”


Kohn gave NHE an update on that work, saying that once all four federations are up and running, they will “take on a life of their own”, with one of the projects having finished, one almost finished, and two having made changes during the federating process and so still have work to do.


The Office of London CCGs ran a workshop on 22 October for GPs and practice staff working on federation, updating each other on progress, successes and barriers.


Kohn said: “We also looked further to the future and asked ‘how do you win a contract the second time around?’”


Co-commissioning and conflicts


Dr Rowland is also interested in the development of CCG co-commissioning of primary care with NHS England, with


38 | national health executive Nov/Dec 14


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100