This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Combined heat & power


Getting the best out of green solutions


Baxi product manager Sean Green


  are switching to new technologies to help them cut carbon emissions, energy bills and meet the increas- ing legislative demands made on their business. Heating and hot water can account for a consider- able amount of a commercial operation’s energy use, so it makes sense that this should be as efficient as possible to help achieve green targets. But while more and more companies are investing in combined heat and power (CHP), solar thermal and heat pumps, they are not all reaping the benefits.


According to a benchmarking exercise carried out by CarbonBuzz (the RIBA and CIBSE platform for tracking energy use in buildings from design to opera- tion) many new builds are using between 1.5 and 2.5 times the amount of energy predicted dur- ing their design. A major factor contributing to these gaps between actual and predicted energy use is carbon saving tech- nology that does not perform as it was intended to, and in particular technologies incorrectly specified for the application.


These statistics may paint a somewhat gloomy picture but of course they are not representative of every installation. There are lots of examples where notable carbon and operational savings have been achieved using low carbon or renewable technologies, but these


While more companies are investing in CHP, they are not all reaping the benefits


18 | July 2014 | HVR


Renewable and low carbon technologies should be hailed as the saviour of commercial heating, helping users to reduce their carbon emissions and cut energy costs. However recent research suggests that in some cases, green technologies are falling short of these high expectations – often due to incorrect specification – with users left counting the cost. Sean Green explains why sizing and specification are key to optimum savings


results are usually for projects where the building type, product technology and installation have all been properly considered. When things go awry, we usually find an application where renewable or low carbon technol- ogy has been incorrectly specified, which will significantly hamper the technology’s performance and the energy savings achievable. In too many cases, the ‘10 per cent for luck’ rule is used, leaving users with larger plant than is actually necessary. In addition to being more expensive to purchase in the first place, bigger plant does not mean better performance – in fact, often the contrary.


One issue that we are seeing a rise in is the use of large-scale CHP units where they are not appropriate. CHP is a well-estab- lished technology which is becoming very popular in Europe – it doesn’t depend on weather or ground conditions or other unpre- dictable factors and can generate both heat and electricity. Unlike many other renewable solutions, it can be easily retrofitted, making it a flexible solution for existing or new buildings. To work effectively, CHP needs to be kept as small as possible. Micro-CHP units offer a versatile heating solution for various sized applications, particularly as they can be used in cascade to meet the demands of larger properties when required. We would always advise that a CHP unit should be sized so that it is capable of meet- ing a building’s base load heating requirements on its own; to max- imise its electrical generation potential. By ensuring the CHP’s engine is working hard, users ben- efit from continually generated low cost, low carbon electricity as a by-product of producing the base load heating. Oversized units do not have enough demand to


run continuously and therefore the amount of electricity produced will be well below the customer’s expectations.


In fact, the closer you can match the user’s demands to the capabilities of the CHP, the better efficiencies achievable. A CHP unit should run for at least 4,000 hours per year for the best return on investment, so is not recom- mended for buildings with low demand for heat such as offices or shops. Better paybacks and CO2 savings are achieved in buildings with year-round demand for heat, such as apartment blocks, shel- tered housing, fire stations, care homes and hotels. These users will also benefit from regular Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI) payments too if they have a quali- fying installation, to further improve their returns.


CHP is a reliable and proven technology capable of delivering great savings and reducing a building’s carbon footprint.


With careful specification, con- sidering the needs of the end user and how they will use their equip- ment, CHP can help commercial customers maximise energy sav- ings and their return on invest- ment. Low carbon and renewable technologies are here to stay and we must ensure they perform to their full potential to encourage more businesses to make the switch to a greener future.


// The author is the senior product manager at Baxi Commercial //


The Baxi SenerTec Dachs mini-CHP unit


Daily news update at www.heatingandventilating.net


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40