This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
foundries to lead to casting technological properties differ- ent from those known from conventional materials. There- fore several tests were conducted to examine the material’s susceptibility to dross formation, its mould filling behaviour and shrinkage tendency.


In a dross test, the surface of the metal bath was exposed to oxygen (air) for 1 to 1.5 minutes in a basin. The complete melt including the dross layer was then poured through a filter, as illustrated in Figure 9. The pouring capacity was logged by means of a digital scale. Reproducible results of these tests were that cast iron with an Si content of 2.5% led to blocking of the filter, while with 4% Si in the cast iron the filter remained open (Figure 10). Hence, the result is contrary to what was originally expected, namely that a higher Si content would promote dross formation.


Further tests were conducted with a test casting specially developed for these materials (a casting harp with plates and webs of different thicknesses between 0.12 and 0.24 in.). The filling behaviour of the alloys in the “casting harp” was independent of the Si content. The differences if any resulted primarily from variations in the casting temperature.


Additionally, different plates, cubes and cylinders were cast using alloys with different Si contents (CE value was 4.3 in all cases). From sections taken from the feeders and feeder necks it could be told that the feeding requirement and extraction behaviour of Si-alloyed ferritic grades are virtually the same as with conventional cast iron grades. The comparison of the exothermal top feeders of, for ex- ample, different cast cylinders (height and diameter each 4.7 in.) with 2.2 and 4.0% Si showed no significant differ- ences in the feeder weight and the appearance of the sec- tions and the cut surfaces of the feeders. The evaluation of the feeder neck samples (cubes with edge length of 1.58 in. and at the side, arranged different dimension feeder necks)5 showed on the other hand that it might be necessary to de- sign the feeder neck somewhat larger when feeding alloys with higher Si contents under pressure.


Dynamic and Cyclic Mechanical Properties


Charpy impact tests were performed at temperatures be- tween -94°F and 248°F with different conventional and so- lution strengthened ductile cast iron grades. As expected, the impact resistance of the solution strengthened grades was lower than that of the conventional grades (e.g. GJS-500-7: 7 J and GJS-500-14: 3 J at 77°F). Even at a test temperature of 248°F, the specimens of GJS-500-14 and 600-10 did not exhibit a clearly identifiable upper shelf.


In terms of the cyclic properties, solution strengthened ductile cast iron performs better. Figures 11 and 12 show the fatigue strength values of conventional ferritic/ pearlitic GJS-500-7 and of ferritic solution strengthened


International Journal of Metalcasting/Volume 8, Issue 2, 2014


Figure 10. This graph illustrates weight versus test duration for basin filling with varied Si and Mg contents.


39


GJS-500-14 in stress-cycle diagrams. At 40,624 psi, the fatigue strength of the solution strengthened ductile cast iron is higher than that of the ferritic/pearlitic material (37,235 psi).


Summary


Due to the favourable properties of Si-alloyed ductile cast iron grades (high strength at fairly good elongation, uniform hardness distribution and better machinability), a strong demand for these grades can be expected for the future. In Germany, this new group of material grades is already being used in various applications, e.g. continuously cast products, rollers and pinion cages.


Figure 9. Testing device for the measurement of the dross generating behaviour of cast iron melts.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97