This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
months of defective castings in mere minutes.


Follow the Rules Te biggest difference between


iron and other alloys is the expansion of iron during graphite precipita- tion in solidification. Tis difference means iron castings can become self-feeding after the onset of expan- sion in most situations, so no further feeding is required. Appropriately, a feeding system for iron castings should provide metal only for the contraction of the liquid alloy and solidifying iron prior to expan- sion. Once the expansion begins, a well-designed feeding system should contain the pressure so the casting is self-feeding during the remainder of solidification. Tis principle is in direct contrast to other alloys, such as steel, where there is no expansion and feed metal must be supplied during most or all of solidification. Another major difference between


iron and other alloys has to do with the mechanism involved in piping. Iron alloys (particularly ductile iron) do not readily form a solid skin dur- ing solidification. For feeders to pipe effectively, atmospheric pressure must be able to collapse the weak plastic skin when the internal pressure drops. After a feeder punctures the skin, the internal pressure then is equalized within a feeding zone (the area within a casting where liquid metal can flow from one point to another in response to expansion pressures). Only one feeder should be used for each feeding zone. If multiple feeders are placed on the same zone, one feeder will begin piping while the others will not. Often, porosity will be seen at contact points of the non-piping feeders. Iron’s requirement for a single


feeder within a single zone is the design rule that is violated most often. When porosity is found at a feeder contact point, the tendency of many engineers is to add more feeders; this is exactly the wrong approach to take and will worsen the situation. Te ductile iron control arm, shown


in Figure 1a, is an example of an iron casting with an incorrectly designed feeding system. Te metalcasting facil-


Fig. 4. The casting has two areas of high modu- lus value, but there’s only one feeding zone.


Fig. 2. Porosity at one of the two feeders was common.


determine the location and size of the casting’s feed zones. Understanding the transfer modulus (MTR


), a calcula-


tion relating to metal flow within a casting, can help determine if a casting has one or more feeding zones. If metal cannot flow from one


ity originally approached the feeding design for this iron casting by placing two symmetrical feeders, shown in Figure 1b. Tis approach was under- standable, because the feeders were attached to the heaviest sections of the casting. During initial production, porosity occurred at one feeder contact on a consistent basis, as shown in Fig- ure 2. Te porosity was not always at the same contact, but on a large major- ity of castings, one contact showed evidence of porosity while the other did not. As a result, the metalcasting facility could not produce a quality casting with this pattern design.


Design With Data To correctly design feeder systems


for iron castings, it is necessary to


to surface area in various areas of the casting. Te modulus is used to estimate the order of solidification by allowing engineers to estimate the progress of solidification in a casting. In iron castings, the modulus is used to estimate when expansion will begin and is expressed as a percentage of complete solidification. Modern software programs can


location to another, each feeding zone may require its own feeder (but no more than one). Te casting modulus (MC


) represents the ratio of volume


simulate solidification in a few minutes, and the resulting data then can be converted to casting modu- lus values. A casting with a higher modulus (heavy section castings) will begin to expand earlier and will undergo more expansion than a cast- ing with a low modulus (light section castings). Te point when expansion begins is referred to as the shrinkage time point. Knowing the shrinkage time point


allows the calculation of an equivalent modulus value that corresponds to the modulus at which contraction of the iron stops and expansion begins. Tis modulus value is known as the MTR


casting where liquid metal transfer is possible. Te calculation of MTR


MTR


Fig. 3. Engineers first ran a solidification simulation without gating or feeders.


simulation, one can determine whether the entire casting is a single feed zone (the modulus transfer is continuous throughout the casting) or contains multiple zones (modulus transfer is discontinuous). Te number of feeding


= SQR (ST/100) * MC By plotting the MTR


in a casting


, because it defines the areas of the is:


ONLINE RESOURCE


Find the original research paper at www.moderncasting.com


October 2013 MODERN CASTING | 35


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68