This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
70


Legal Focus


JULY 2013


Employment Law and Disputes


Employment law is a vast and often complex regulatory web to navigate. The law needs to accurately balance the needs of both the employer and the employee, without a solution for one negatively impacting on the needs of the other. To find out about the recent developments in Chinese labour law, such as the Supreme People's Court’s recent Interpretation on a variety of issues, Lawyer Monthly speaks to Kevin Jones, partner at Faegre Baker Daniels, a U.S. based firm with international offices in London, Shanghai and Beijing


Can you briefly introduce yourself and your firm?


Faegre Baker Daniels has a strong firm-wide employment capability comprising more than 100 legal professionals. I head the firm’s China labor and employment team, which is one of the leading practices of its kind in China. We have wide industry experience having represented or advised multinationals in the retail, luxury apparel and goods, manufacturing, entertainment, airline, energy, information technology, food and agriculture, telecommunications, healthcare, life sciences and energy sectors.


I have been based in China for over 17 years and was recently recognized as a leading employment lawyer by Legal 500 for three consecutive years (2010, 2011 and 2012) and Chambers Asia for three consecutive years (2011, 2012 and 2013).


What are the key types of employment-related cases you deal with?


Our team advises on all aspects of both contentious and non-contentious employment matters. We have a particular focus on staffing issues arising from acquisitions and other re-organizations, strategic employment counseling, employee hiring and termination, establishment and enforcement of company polices, advising on labor union issues, drafting and negotiating collective contracts, labor disputes and anti- corruption compliance.


What are the main challenges you face?


The main challenge at the moment is dealing with the increasing number of labor disputes faced by our clients. These can arise in a number of contexts, ranging from arbitration or litigation relating to claims of unlawful termination to work stoppages


www.lawyer-monthly.com


and strikes. Employees are increasingly aware of their legal rights and how to leverage these rights to their advantage through various means.


We recently assisted a client with settling a work stoppage that arose in the context of an asset sale where the employees were to transfer to the purchaser. Although the transaction was viewed favourably by the employees, they were quick to organize and use the opportunity to negotiate the payment of certain entitlements that would have otherwise transferred to the purchaser. Employees are well aware that employers cannot afford production stoppages and that authorities will typically try to settle such disputes by persuading the parties to undertake some form of collective bargaining.


Additionally, a significant portion of our work over the past year related to assisting our clients with disputes regarding terminations and reductions in force. Terminating employees in China is notoriously difficult so successfully defending a unilateral termination or effectively managing multiple terminations simultaneously is very challenging.


Recently the Supreme People's Court issued its fourth interpretation on a variety of issues relating to the application of law in the trial of employment disputes. Please give me an overview of this.


The Employment Contract Law (ECL) and related laws and regulations often contain gaps where uncertainty can arise in their application. The Supreme People’s Court steps in and provides guidance from time to time to fill such gaps. Interpretation 4, issued in February of this year, is the court’s latest effort in this respect and covers the following:


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132