64
Legal Focus
JULY 2013
Debt Refinancing and Restructuring
Looking further into the issues surrounding debt refinancing and restructuring, we speak to Dr. Stefan Henkelmann from Allen & Overy in Frankfurt, Germany.
Please introduce yourself, your role and your firm.
Allen & Overy is a leading international law firm with 42 offices in 29 countries. We are at the heart of the world's banking and financial markets. With over 1,000 banking and finance lawyers worldwide, we have one of the largest and most international teams of any global law firm. In Germany, Allen & Overy fields the market's pre-eminent banking and finance practice with some 70 lawyers.
As a Counsel in the International Capital Markets department of Allen & Overy in Frankfurt, I have extensive experience in German and international capital markets transactions. I specialise in securitisations, structured finance and restructurings in the capital markets sector. I regularly advise on a wide variety of securitisations – with a particular focus on Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities (CMBS) – other structured finance transactions, and restructurings such as CMBS restructurings, corporate bond restructurings, and NPL transactions.
the refinancing and restructuring market has evolved radically over the last few years. How have you seen the market change recently in your jurisdiction?
One major development, in my view, is the evolving role of capital markets lending and refinancing. While the German debt market had traditionally been dominated by bank lending, a shift from loan to bond financing and
www.lawyer-monthly.com
refinancing will be one of the key features of the corporate debt market of the future. The tightening of regulation is likely to further shrink the size and scope of traditional bank lending activity and will increase the cost of bank credit which will in turn increase the demand for bond financing provided by alternative lenders. At the start of this year, many borrowers have taken advantage of benign credit market conditions to raise long-term financing at relatively low costs and refinancing activity has driven the markets. In particular, in the real estate market we have seen a shift from bank to non-bank lending. We have recently been involved in the successful refinancing of large German legacy CMBS deals by means of bonds or new CMBS transactions.
Yet there is still a significant level of leveraged loans outstanding which either need refinancing or restructuring as the “wall of debt” approaches with the peak period of maturity in 2015/16. While for investment grade corporates the refinancing of existing debt by unsecured bank loans or bonds, or a combination thereof, is still a viable option, non- investment grade corporates may try to issue secured bonds or high yield bonds but some of them may struggle to obtain refinancing and may need to extend maturities, which may increase involuntary refinancing accompanied by covenant resets. Where such “amend & extend” strategies cannot be implemented, this could result in an increase in defaults or insolvencies.
Another key trend on the debt restructuring side is that deals have become more international and restructuring across borders has become more important over the last few years. On the one hand, this adds legal complexity and can make a successful restructuring more challenging. On the other hand, this has offered opportunities to use a more “rescue friendly” foreign insolvency law regime. There have been prominent cases where German distressed companies restructured their debt by means of shifting their centre of main interest to England or using English schemes of arrangement or company voluntary arrangements in order to implement a debt restructuring. In response, the German legislator has adopted a reform of the German Insolvency Code (ESUG) in March 2012 in order to make the German restructuring regime more competitive. The ESUG has significantly increased creditors’ influence, enables debt-to- equity swaps as part of insolvency plan proceedings and has introduced a protective shield (Schutzschirm) to support self-administration. The ESUG does, however, not generally allow an out-of-court debt restructuring by means of majority vote. It remains to be seen whether the new German restructuring regime will provide an efficient rescue statute which, in combination with a developing “rescue culture” in Germany, can prove to be a competitive and effective restructuring tool.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132