This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
60


Legal Focus


JULY 2013


Competition Commission of India & Competition Law


With a recent transportation company coming under suspicion for freight rigging and another investigation involving a group of general insurers, the CCI has been highly active in recent months. To find out more, Lawyer Monthly benefits from an exclusive article from Samir Gandhi, a partner at AZB & Partners’ New Delhi offices. Samir deals with a range of competition, antitrust, international trade and WTO issues. Who’sWhoLegal 2013 lists him as a leading competition practitioner in India, and Who’sWhoLegal 2010 as a leading trade and customs practitioner.


A


ZB & Partners are closely associated with the development and practice of competition law in India. They


participated in the consultation process leading up to the framing of merger control regulations under the Competition Act 2002 (‘CA02’). They have since interacted closely with the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India (‘MCA’) and the Competition Commission of India (‘CCI’), India’s competition regulator. The firm’s lawyers have also acted as counsel to the CCI in its early litigation to overcome the initial roadblocks to its functioning.


With the opening up of Indian markets to foreign trade, the CCI’s role has become increasingly important. The CCI is a pan-sectoral regulator and no sector is exempt from its purview.


It has a threefold


responsibility, (i) prevent anticompetitive activities (ii) discipline defaulters, and (iii) protect the end consumer. Proposed amendments to the CA02, currently awaiting approval from the Indian Parliament, would enable the MCA to prescribe sector-specific thresholds, potentially giving the CCI greater oversight over sensitive sectors like pharmaceuticals.


www.lawyer-monthly.com


Enterprises operating in the Indian market must ensure they are fully compliant with the CA02. Collaborations with competitors, imposition of vertical restraints upon suppliers/distributors, and conduct of dominant enterprises necessarily need to be within the bounds of the CA02. It is mandatory for a merger, acquisition or amalgamation to be notified to the CCI on crossing certain asset/turnover thresholds, if it cannot avail of any of the prescribed exemptions.


The CA02 and its ancillary regulations apply equally to foreign enterprises. However, there is some confusion with respect to offshore transactions by multi-national companies. Under the merger control regulations, an offshore transaction with insignificant local nexus in India need not ‘normally’ notify the CCI. However, the CCI’s decisional practice shows it is unlikely to allow overseas deals the benefit of this exemption if the parties cross the prescribed asset/turnover thresholds in India. In the face of such uncertainty, parties are urged to tread with caution when deciding whether or not to notify any offshore deal.


The CCI may institute proceedings against an enterprise for any infringement


of the provisions of the CA02, either of its own accord or on the basis of information from any party. Erring enterprises could face significant penalties of up to 10% of the average annual turnover for the past three preceding years. For cartels, this penalty may be the higher of up to three times the participant’s profit or 10% of its turnover for each year of the agreement. Failure to notify a combination may attract a penalty equivalent to the higher of 1% of the total assets or turnover of the combination. Finally, follow-on actions for compensation may be brought before the Competition Appellate Tribunal. LM


Contact:


Samir Gandhi AzB & Partners Plot no. A 8


Sector 4, noida, India – 201301. tel: +91 120 4179999


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132