This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
CMP SERIES CERTIFICATION MADE POSSIBLE Robert Gilbert


RFP spam is particularly a problem for independent properties, ‘because they have got to juggle manpower at the individual-unit level.’


Nostrand said. “Customers feel that if they source more hotels, it will improve their RFP response rate. This practice can sometimes actually delay response times.” Not that those customers always realize RFP spam is an issue. Elite Meetings brought together planners and hotel sales professionals at its Elite Meetings Alliance program at Revel in Atlantic City last August. One of the sessions was a panel discussion on “RFP Process & Volume.” “The panel was about RFP spam, period,” said Kelly Foy, Elite’s CEO. “The amazing thing was that about 65 percent of the planner attendees had no idea that was a problem. And every hotelier in the room knew it was a problem.” For at least one planner, the problem with


eRFPs goes beyond how many of them pile up in someone’s inbox. “I definitely see [RFP spam] as a legitimate problem,” said Larissa Schultz, CMP, owner of LJS Meeting Strategies, “but I think we need to take a step back and realize this system that we’ve created in our industry to have every- thing go electronically may be be broken. And it was a great concept and a great theory, but in prac- tice what you’re seeing is, meeting planners can’t precisely figure out what their unique needs are, so they ship something out to everybody and hope somebody responds back.” But not everyone — not even every hotelier


Test Time Once you finish reading this CMP Series article, read or


watch the following material:


› “Choosing a Housing Provider,” on pp. 380–385 of Chapter 25 of Professional Meeting Management, Fifth Edition, available at convn.org/pmm5-housing.


› “Indecent Proposals: Has It Become Too Easy for Companies to Send an RFP?,” a video interview between International Meetings Review’s James Latham and Stephen Powell, senior vice president of worldwide sales for InterContinental Hotel Group, at convn.org/imr-rfp.


To earn one hour of CEU credit, visit pcma.org/ convenecmp to answer questions about the information contained in this CMP Series article and the additional material.


The Certified Meeting Professional (CMP) is a registered trademark of the Convention Industry Council.


— thinks RFP spam is a problem. Michael Domin- guez, senior vice president of corporate hotel sales for MGM Resorts International and the self- admitted “contrarian in the room,” simply sees it as part of life and business in the 21st century. “I’m a firm believer that we live in an on-demand soci- ety,” Dominguez said. “We’ve trained the customer and the consumer to be able to get what they want, where they want it, and how they want it. For us as an industry to dig in and think that we’re going to be able to change the way our customer wants to buy from us is a little bit of an unrealistic view of the process.”


THE HUMAN TOUCH But, like Dominguez says, that’s something of a minority view. RFP spam is especially problematic for independent properties, Gilbert said, “because they have got to juggle manpower at the individual- unit level, where at least the brands can redirect or reallocate some of their national or global sales teams to deal with some of the traffic.”


46 PCMA CONVENE APRIL 2013 PCMA.ORG


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164