This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
ITC: PUBLIC INTEREST


The US International Trade Commission has been giving more weight to public interest factors in recent times, as Carl Charneski explains.


Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, empowers the US International Trade Commission (ITC) to investigate unfair trade practices such as unfair methods of competition and unfair acts in the importation of articles, as well as patent, copyright, trademark, and mask work infringement, where the infringing products are imported into the US.


In the course of its investigations, the ITC


takes into account ‘public interest factors’. T is is done both at the beginning and the end of an investigation. Until recently, public interest factors received little attention. Certainly there have been times when they took centre stage and stole the spotlight, but overall, they just didn’t seem to be important at the ITC—at least, not consistently. Today, that is no longer the case and public interest factors have grown hugely in relevance.


In the public interest T e public interest factors are: • Public health and welfare; • Competitive conditions in the US economy;


• T e production of like or directly competitive articles in the US; and


• US consumers.


T ese factors are fi rst taken into account when a complaint is fi led, and before a notice of investigation is issued. T is early consideration of public interest allows the ITC to determine at the very start of an investigation whether the administrative law judge (ALJ) should take evidence on these factors.


T e second time that public interest factors come into play is aſt er the ALJ issues an initial determination and recommends a remedy (also known as a Recommended Determination). T is article addresses the ITC’s consideration of the public interest in fashioning a remedy in the event of a Section 337 violation.


To understand the potential importance of the public interest factors, one need only look to the statute. Section 337(d)(1) provides that the


www.worldipreview.com World Intellectual Property Review September/October 2012 37


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128