This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
JUNE 2012


Legal Focus Disputes in the


chevron contamination case still appears to be far from over


The energy sector is one constantly touched by rapid change and development, and inevitably, dispute. Dispute in business is inevitable, and the energy sector is no different. It is an integral part of growing a business, succeeding within it, and maintaining that success. It is how disputes are handled that matters.


A


s environmental concerns become more and more severe, regulation becomes stricter and businesses have to fight an ever-evolving battle


to keep up and stay compliant, and face the consequences when something goes wrong.


Disputes can arise from almost any area of business within the energy sector – intellectual property related disputes such as copyrights, patents and trademarks; contract issues and employment disputes. However, despite the inevitability, the extent to which any disputes spread and the extent to which they affect your business, reputation and profit, can be controlled. By consulting experienced and skilled legal experts, disputes may not always be avoided entirely, but they can be navigated effectively and a solution beneficial to all involved is more likely to be settled.


One of the most high profile energy


disputes in recent history is the Chevron Amazon pollution case, which relates to the accusation that Texaco, which merged with Chevron over ten years ago, disposed of 18bn gallons of toxic materials between 1972 and 1992 in the Ecuadorean Amazon. Back in January of this year, an appeals court in Ecuador upheld the ruling that Chevron was liable to pay $18.2bn in damages – a decision that the company at the time branded as a ‘fraud’ and ‘illegitimate’. Originally, Chevron was ordered to pay only $8.6bn in damages, but this amount grew to more than double when it failed to declare a public apology.


This case has been complicated and lengthy, and is still ongoing. The latest development has seen the filing of a lawsuit against Chevron by an Ecuadorean community in order to seek remuneration for the alleged contamination. With so many developments, twists and turns, only time will tell how this case will end. LM


57


www.lawyer-monthly.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100