This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
40


An Interview With...


JUNE 2012


Christian Koehler-Ma An Interview With...


Leonhardt comments on the new German Enterprise Restructuring Facilitation act


On March 1st, the new German Company Restructuring Facilitation Act came into force, after almost ten years of discussion and preparation with the aim of bringing the German system more in line with the popular UK system. To find out more about the new rules, Lawyer Monthly, as part of our ‘An Interview with…’ feature, speaks exclusively to Christian Koehler-Ma, from one of the leading law firms in Germany, Leonhardt Rechtsanwälte.


Please tell us about your professional background.


I studied law in Germany and, for one year, in Britain at the London School of Economics. In addition, I spent two years at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, where I took mostly business courses and received a Master of Public Administration degree. I have been working for my firm, Leonhardt Rechtsanwälte, for 22 years, as lawyer, insolvency administrator, partner and managing partner. Leonhardt Rechtsanwälte is one of the leading crisis management and insolvency law firms in Germany.


What were the main weaknesses of the previous system of German insolvency proceedings?


The previous system of German insolvency proceedings was bureaucratic and administrator-orientated. The outcome and timing of the procedure was unpredictable. The court and the insolvency administrator held the major influence on the whole


www.lawyer-monthly.com


process, with the court selecting the insolvency administrator. Some courts tended to choose the insolvency administrator arbitrarily, sometimes against the creditors’ express wishes. This was frequently criticized because under German law the insolvency administrator has far-reaching powers and can make the difference for the creditors’ outcome.


Similarly the debtors were at the court’s and the administrator’s mercy and lost control over their companies. While the letter of the law encouraged restructurings in fact they did not happen as often as desired. Debtor-in-possession proceedings especially were often thwarted by courts who appointed administrators against the wishes of debtors.


Finally, debt-equity swaps were possible only under very narrow circumstances, requiring adherence to complicated and time- consuming procedures under German companies law.


As a result several major insolvency cases were restructured outside of Germany, with


the English scheme of arrangement being chosen despite its high costs and legal uncertainty whether it would bind German creditors at all.


All this is what the German parliament tried to remedy when it passed the reform law, the “Enterprise Restructuring Facilitation Act” (German acronym: ESUG), which came into force on March 1st.


What will be the main points of the ESUG?


The aim of the new law is to both increase the influence of the creditors and to create new possibilities for the reasonable debtor, reasonable meaning somebody who files early and not when the enterprise is beyond repair. The main changes of the ESUG concern the preliminary creditor’s committee, improved debtor-in-possession proceedings and the so-called insolvency plan, a procedure roughly similar to a scheme or a chapter 11 proceeding in the US.


The preliminary creditors’ committee


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100