JURISDICTION REPORT: MEXICO MEXICAN DECLARATIONS OF
WELL-KNOWN AND FAMOUS MARKS Victor Adames
Becerril, Coca & Becerril, SC
Te Mexican Industrial Property Law (MIPL) distinguishes between well- known and famous trademarks, giving the latter wider protection than is given to well-known marks.
According to the MIPL, it is understood that a trademark is well-known in Mexico when a determined sector of the public, or the commercial circles of the country, know the mark as a consequence of commercial activities by the entity that uses the mark on its products or services, or as a consequence of their promotion or publicity, in Mexico or overseas.
On the other hand, the MIPL defines a famous mark as one being known by most consumers. Unlike well-known marks, that are required to be known by a determined commercial sector, famous marks are those known by the public in general, which includes any commercial sector.
In other words, the scope of a trademark considered as a famous mark is larger than the scope of a trademark considered as a well-known mark, since the first refers only to a determined sector while the second one must be known by the majority of consumers.
Te MIPL has established a procedure for obtaining a declaration of well-known or famous trademark from the Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (MIIP).
Te trademark holder has to file a brief requesting the declaration of well- known or famous mark that includes specific information/evidence that proves that the mark is known by a specific sector or by the consuming public (consumers).
The following information must be enclosed: 1. Te sector of the public (real or potential consumers) that identifies the trademark with the products or services that it protects, based on a survey or market study;
2. Other sectors of the public, different from the real or potential consumers, that identify the trademark with the products or services that it protects, based on a survey or market study;
3. Te commercial circles (retailers, industrialists or service providers related with the kind of products or services) that identify the trademark with the products or services that it protects, based on a survey or study market;
4. Te duration of effective advertising of the mark in Mexico, and abroad;
5. Te investment made during the last three years in publicity or promotion of the mark in Mexico, and abroad;
6. Te geographic area of effective influence of the mark;
www.worldipreview.com
“THE REQUIRED INFORMATION AND/ OR DOCUMENTATION TO REQUEST THE DECLARATION OF A WELL-KNOWN OR FAMOUS MARK IS SOMETIMES CONFIDENTIAL AND, IN OTHER CASES, IT IS INCONGRUENT WITH THE VARIOUS INTERNATIONAL TREATIES.”
7. Te volume of sales of the products or the income generated by the provision of services protected under the mark, during the last three years;
8. An estimation of the economic value that the mark represents, in the countable capital of the holder company;
9. Te certificates of registration of the mark in Mexico, and overseas, if any; and
10. Te percentage of participation of the mark in the corresponding sector or segment of the market.
Te required information and/or documentation to request the declaration of a well-known or famous mark is sometimes confidential and, in other cases, it is incongruent with the various international Treaties, as well as with the basic principles of well-known trademarks, since it is required that the well-known or famous mark is used and registered in Mexico.
Moreover, the fact that it is difficult and expensive to obtain evidence to prove each and every condition stipulated by the law, and the high official fees applicable for obtaining the declaration, have been the main reasons the system has not had the success expected. In fact, since the registration proceedings came into force, only a few companies have applied for written declarations from the MIIP.
In addition, it is widely known that one of the basic principles of well- known marks established in international Treaties is that they can achieve the status of well-known or famous even if they are not used and/or registered in a specific country. Terefore, in my opinion, it should not be necessary to submit each of the above-mentioned requisites in order to obtain recognition by the Mexican authorities.
Victor Adames is the manager of trademarks at Becerril, Coca & Becerril, SC. He can be contacted at:
vadames@bcb.com.mx
World Intellectual Property Review May/June 2012 65
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84