This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
DATA SEARCHES


The two offices will continue to work with the Japanese Patent Office, the Korean Intellectual Property Office and the State Intellectual Property Office of the People’s Republic of China on even further simplification and standardisation of patent classification schemes.


Information aggregators such as ProQuest Dialog, however, have little or no control over the structure or content of classification schemes in the databases which they make available to searchers. The goal here is to make the classification scheme as accessible and meaningful as possible for users with a wide range of searching expertise.


A quick and simple way to start to explore any classification scheme is to run a basic keyword search for the main concepts of interest within a database and then to analyse the classification terms which have been applied to the documents retrieved. The most frequently occurring relevant classification terms can then be applied to a subsequent search to expand retrieval to documents which did not contain the original keywords used, but which are nevertheless of potential interest.


In the new ProQuest Dialog service, this analysis of the classification terms is undertaken simultaneously with the search and seamlessly presented to the searcher on the results screen. Additional lateral search links on classification terms within documents also allow the searcher to retrieve other, similarly indexed, documents. Both scenarios allow searchers to immerse themselves in a classification scheme which they may know little about, having started from a basic keyword search. For more advanced searchers, thesauri that can be fully browsed and searched also help in the identification of appropriate classification terms to use.


An interesting advancement of the use and simplification of classification schemes


“IN THE NEW PROQUEST DIALOG SERVICE, THIS ANALYSIS OF THE CLASSIFICATION TERMS IS UNDERTAKEN SIMULTANEOUSLY WITH THE SEARCH AND SEAMLESSLY PRESENTED TO THE SEARCHER ON THE RESULTS SCREEN.”


engineering should be aware that the Institution of Engineering and Technology’s Inspec database has mapped its own indexing schemes to the International Patent Cooperation (IPC), to facilitate the retrieval of relevant non-patent literature by means of a classification structure used for patents.


In both cases a new mass of documentation has been opened up to searchers who may be unfamiliar with the content or classification schemes normally used with them. n


Ian Pearce is a training and information consultant at Dialog. He can be contacted at: ian.pearce@dialog.com


has been an attempt to map a classification scheme intended for one type of document or technology into other areas. The business intelligence tool Innography, for example, has taken US trademark goods and services classification information and mapped this to patent classifications, with the aim of correlating trademarks and the products they represent to any underlying patents. This starts to open up novel search scenarios such as determining the patents that a trademarked product may be infringing.


In addition, anybody with an interest in electronics, computer science, physics, electrical, control, production or mechanical


50 World Intellectual Property Review May/June 2012


Ian Pearce began his career with Derwent Information and spent 12 years within the Thomson Corporation (now Thomson Reuters) in various roles. In 2006, he joined Dialog where he maintains responsibility for providing expert knowledge on Dialog and ProQuest Dialog content, platforms and applications. He holds a BSc Honours degree in chemistry with German.


www.worldipreview.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84