AVOIDING OPEN BRAIN SURGERY


LESS INVASIVE STRATEGIES EXPAND OPTIONS FOR ANEURYSMS, BRAIN TUMOURS AND EVEN STROKE Article courtesy of Johns Hopkins Medicine


man with an arteriovenous malformation who has had multiple heart attacks and is on anticoagulants. This patient clearly isn’t a craniotomy candidate. That’s where Alex Coon, Assistant Professor at Johns Hopkins


T 046 ARAB HEALTH MAGAZINE ISSUE 2 2012


University School of Medicine, comes in. A specialist in endovascular neurosurgery, Coon is able to reach places in the brain and perform procedures that would be impossible using more traditional means. By using x-ray contrast dye as a roadmap to guide catheters and tiny devices through the body’s network of blood vessels - a technique borrowed from interventional radiologists - he can treat aneurysms, arteriovenous malformations, strokes and even some brain tumours in many patients who aren’t able to undergo traditional open surgery. One of the more common procedures Coon provides is ‘coiling’


an aneurysm - threading a bundle of platinum wires into the aneurysm to block blood flow and prevent rupture. It’s an alternative to the


he open craniotomy has been a boom for neurosurgery, saving lives and restoring neurological health to countless patients. But what if the operation is more dangerous than the problem it aims to fix? Take the example of an elderly


traditional standby of clipping an aneurysm, which requires an open craniotomy. For patients who qualify for coiling and other endovascular surgeries, the benefits are a less invasive treatment, shorter recovery time and lower risk of complications. “It’s not a good modality for all patients,” says Coon, “but someone


trained in both traditional neurosurgery and endovascular techniques can understand which patients each type of treatment would be appropriate for and offer patients more options.” Coon is also working to improve the technology. He and his colleagues are on the cusp of creating a new type of catheter that will allow even more types of patients to undergo endovascular treatments. Additionally, he’s studying the safety of new endovascular devices, the best way to use them, and innovative ways to get devices where they’re needed in the brain. “Physicians have been putting stents in the heart for a long time


now,” Coon says, “so people ask, what’s the big deal with putting one in the brain? The difference between the heart and the brain is an extra foot and a half and about 20 more torturous curves in the arteries. We have zero margin of error.”


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84