This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.



STANDARD BEARER: Industry consultant and educator Sue Tinnish has played a key role in shepherding the APEX standards through the arduous process of gaining consensus approval. She expects the standards to create new opportunities for meeting planners within organizations and with clients. “This is the perfect opportunity,” she said, “to stand up and show leadership.”


When Sue Tinnish and Lawrence Leonard, CMP, bounded onto the stage at the Green Meeting Industry Council’s 2011 Annual Meeting in Portland this past February to talk about the upcoming launch of the APEX/ASTM Environmentally Sustainable Meeting Standards, they did so to the strains of Rod Stewart singing, “Do Ya Think I’m Sexy?”


They were kidding, of course. The standards, which were


created by a Convention Industry Council (CIC)–led team of 200 meetings-industry volunteers working with the Environ- mental Protection Agency and ASTMInternational, have been called a lot of things. Daunting, for one. They describe, in detail, actions for achieving and measuring sustainability in nine industry areas: accommodations, audiovisual produc- tion, communications and marketing, destinations, exhibits, food-and-beverage, meeting venue, on-site offices, and trans- portation. The APEX process has also been called painfully slow, because the release of the standards has been antici- pated for months. (See “What’s Taking So Long?,” p. 61.) But sexy? Not so much. It’s not hard to see why. The new standards tend heavily


toward metrics and measurement, and are the result of end- less—and endlessly painstaking—conversations about top- ics that include the “tensile strength of cement,” according to Tinnish, the ASTM/APEX liaison. When “you get into the nuts and bolts of individual line-item requirements,” added Leonard, CIC’s APEX program director, “there’s no denying that the technical wording is dry.” Increasingly, however, the standards are being perceived


60 pcma convene April 2011


less as a set of geeky guidelines and more as a unique— and, yes, exciting—opportunity to align industry initiatives and goals, so that when it comes to sustainability issues, all oars are pulling in the same direction.


‘A Single, Unified Scorecard’ As it is, “what one meeting planner calls a green meeting, another will not,” said Ian Lipton, chief operating officer for the Toronto-based Carbon Accounting Company, which tracks and reports on environmental impacts.With the release of the standards, said Lipton, who helped develop them, the meetings industry will have “a meaningful way to truly gauge its environmental impact.” Added NancyWilson Zavada, CMP, a co-founder of the


Green Meeting Industry Council (GMIC) and founder of Portland, Ore.–based MeetGreen, which was one of the first meeting-planning companies to integrate sustainability into its business practices and to develop metrics that meas- ured the environmental impacts of meetings: “Finally, in 2011, the meetings industry will have an answer to the question, what does it mean to be green?” There are few industries for which it’s more important to


www.pcma.org


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118