This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
gram. “But what we’ve been doing more recently is virtual chart pulls, and ask- ing learners to track some of their patients, so we can measure even more about how the education got drilled down to actually affecting the patient,” Pagano said. “And that’s the penultimate goal — to measure patient outcomes.” This can be difficult, depending


“What we’ve been


doing is virtual chart pulls, asking learners to track


on the discipline. In oncology, for example, patients’ potentially shorter-term longevity makes it hard to measure outcomes. “For an oncol- ogist, to us it’s more about knowledge,” Pagano said. “Do they know the studies that are out there? Do they know all available treatment options?” Onthe other hand, learning areas such as diabetes education


some of their patients, so we can measure how the education got drilled down.”


lend themselves to longer-termmeasurement.“Oneof your learn- ing objectives could be, you want to lower the blood-sugar level in 75 percent of your patients,” Pagano said, “and we’re going


to teach you how to do that.” That’s the final frontier, as the two survey respondents quoted on p. 50 also indicated: patient outcomes. “It’s easy tosay we can change physician behavior,” Pagano said, “but demon- strating population health is going to be the next hurdle.” And not an impossible one. The


MEDICAL MEETINGS


Institute recently conducted an oph- thalmology CME activity in which it asked 10 physicians to track 10 patients each over the course of three


months. As a result, “we were able to demonstrate that the education made a big dif- ference in how they diagnosed and treated those


patients,” Pagano said. “And ultimately the patients all did very well.” 


 Hunter R. Slaton is a senior editor of Convene.


DoYou CMEWhat I CME?


Health-care reform, technology, and other forces are changing how continuing medical education is delivered—and spurring the evolution of organizations like the Alliance for CME and the Global Alliance for Medical Education.


 54 BY NANCY MANN JACKSON


For 35 years, the Alliance for ContinuingMedical Education has served CMEproviders that offer programsdesigned primarily for physician audi- ences. But at the 2011 Alliance Annual Conference in San Francisco this past January, the organization announced that it would be broadening its focus to include continuing educationandprofessional development for all health-care professionals. 


pcmaconvene April 2011 www.pcma.org


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118