This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
‘Looking at It From a TotallyMeasureable


Point of View’ Tricia Simpson, CMP, Manager, Meetings & Conventions InternationalTrademarkAssociation (INTA)





‘YOU WOULD BE SURPRISED’: Some second-tier cities represent themselves as first-tier when they make sales calls to INTA’s Tricia Simpson.


It’s difficult not having a source that has [an accepted listing of the city-tier classifications], so


when people come to my office from cities to do sales calls, I generally ask them what [level] they consider their city to be, and you would be surprised at the answers I get. Because they


“Most cities that say they’re first-tier, access is their No. 1 claim, and then culture, the convention center, and hotels.”


present themselves a certainway, but when they’re asked point- blank, they admit that they’re a second-tier destination. About 65 percent of INTA’s attendees are international, so


accessibility is very important tous. Attendees have tobe able to get [to the host city] in one leg or less. The more direct flights, the better.We can’t go anywhere people can’t get to. And most of the cities that come in and say they’re first-tier, that is their No. 1 [claim]—access to the city—and then culture, the con- vention center, and the hotels. There’s the cultural aspect of the city. It has to have some- thing to offer.We need to be close to where businesses are located


50 pcmaconvene February 2011 www.pcma.org


so that people can combine the trip—they’re traveling very far—and, of course, you have the convention center and hotel component. For example, Seattle is not a first-tier city, but for us, it was a great destination because our group is “hugely net- working” and so even though we didn’t have the lift that we wanted into Seattle, once we got there, the convention center and the hotels were right in the same area, and it made it eas- ier to find people and to get around and all the restaurants were close by. It’s a compact little city. Chicago considers itself first-tier, but we didn’t, because it


was difficult for ourmembers tomove around. In the end, when you host ameeting and you look at all the different components that the city has to offer, it’s difficult generally to say what con- stitutes first-tier and second-tier. I think the distinction between the different tiers will remain


largely a matter of perception, because what’s first-tier to me may not be first-tier to someone else. Looking at it from a totally measurable point of view would give the [classifications] some consistency, but it still would mean different things to differ- ent people. 


Michelle Russell is editor in chief of Convene.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108