This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Biomass heating – the UK’s hottest opportunity!


By Neil Turner RES Group


On 10 March 2011 the UK Government announced the biggest shake up of the heating industry in decades. The Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI) has been designed by the Department of Energy & Climate Change (DECC) to revolutionise the way buildings are heated and will mean biomass heating is financially the preferred choice in all commercial and public buildings. It is the first financial support scheme for renewable heat in the world!


The Triple Benefit As well as the income from the RHI, heat users benefit from the carbon savings achieved as they offset the Carbon Reduction Commitment (CRC) levy and from reduced use of counterfactual fuel (this is usually the incumbent fossil fuel such as gas, oil or LPG). This triple benefit (RHI, CRC and bill savings from displaced fossil fuel) makes biomass the UK’s most financially attractive fuel.


The tariffs have been set to achieve a 12% return on the additional cost of using biomass heating as an alternative to gas, therefore projects displacing oil or LPG can achieve even greater returns. It is estimated within DECC’s RHI Impact Assessment that nearly 50% of the £860million of Treasury funding for the RHI will be spent on biomass heating, which is over double the share of any other renewable energy technology. The funding is expected to stimulate £4.5 billion of capital investment up to 2020, which equates to an estimated 13,000 installations of renewable heating systems in the industrial sector as well as 110,000 installations in the commercial and public sector.


It is estimated within a DECC press release (March 2011) that 25% of the heat demand in the public and commercial sector will come from renewable sources by 2020 and biomass heating is vital for the UK to stay on track to meet its EU obligations of 20% of total energy from renewable energy by 2020. This means that biomass heat technologies and the RHI are set to transform the monitoring and delivery of heating, hot water and in some cases cooling within buildings.


Intelligently designed government scheme Set to begin on 30th September 2011, the details of the RHI released so far indicate an intelligently designed tiered tariff mechanism. The idea is that an income is guaranteed over a 20 year period as long as the equipment continues to work and deliver usable heat, but the tariff reduces significantly each and every year after 1314 hours of operation (this equates to a 15% load


factor, but in a conventional UK space heating demand profile this typically equates to over 50% of the annual load). This means there is a big incentive to deliver heat, but no incentive to over-consume fuel and waste heat. Various further safe guards such as heat meters and spot checks are all going to be used to ensure the RHI is not abused and that the technology delivers on its promises. This ‘policing’ of renewable heat is a massive wake up call for the heating industry and means there will be a new breed of renewable heat user focusing on whole life costs - selecting quality equipment that is well designed and capable of delivering heat for at least 20 years.


Over the last decade building-integrated renewable energy has mainly been installed in new developments to meet planning requirements such as the ‘Merton Rule’ (a percentage renewable energy requirement for new developments. For many Councils this has been a 10% target based on carbon or total onsite energy consumption. A number of Council’s have increased this requirement to 20%, which is highly challenging to achieve without the use of biomass heating).


This


policy and various grant programmes have enabled the biomass heating industry to flourish and quality fuel supply networks have developed. Procurement decisions are often based on biomass heating being the most cost effective onsite renewable energy to deliver carbon savings (project analysis nearly always shows biomass heating saves the most carbon at the lowest cost – ‘the £ spent to carbon saved ratio’). The ‘Merton Rule’ and grant programmes, although commendable for enabling the renewable energy market to develop, did not include any retribution if theoretical carbon savings were not achieved. This meant the construction industry could continue to drive down capital costs and some never delivered the carbon savings promised. The RHI completely changes this with payments made on a quarterly metered heat basis – the whole life cost is now critical to a projects success!


ENVIRONMENT INDUSTRY MAGAZINE |85|


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192