GREEN SYSTEMS SOLAR SOLUTIONS
Solar hot water analysis with SAM (system advisor model)
BY BRISTOL STICKNEY CONTRIBUTING WRITER
type of equipment, its configuration and size all have a profound effect on the actual solar benefits. I have mentioned in previous columns that there are computer simulation models available to help sort out this complexity. I recently turned to one myself to help make some comparisons. I have been working with two different solar heating
A 72
designs, one in Texas and one in Oregon. In both cases, the design process began with the idea that solar domestic hot water (SDHW) was desired, and the question was whether to use vacuum tube collectors or flat plate panels to provide the solar heat. Since the climate and the location of these jobs is very different, one might expect the answer to the collector question to be different as well. I decided to use the system advisor model (SAM) solar simulation program to help evaluate these situations in a manner that is (presumably) fast, impartial and accurate.
SAM: What it is and how it works I like to think of SAM as the solar analysis tool
provided by “Uncle SAM.” It was created by the U.S. government at the national labs, so it has been placed in the public domain. The program can be downloaded free at the National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL) website. The program puts a lot of emphasis on photovoltaic analysis and other even more exotic energy technologies. If you look through the menus carefully, you will find
ctive solar hot water systems operate in a world of relatively complex interactions. The weather, hot water usage patterns, shifting temperatures, the
sources. Run the program while you are connected to the Internet, and it will find weather data very quickly. Once located and installed in the program, a weather file will provide typical weather for that location, hour by hour, for one year. The weather data and the solar heating system inputs are used by the simulation engine (TRNSYS) to produce results that can be summarized by hour, day, month or year.
Useful features and results
Here is a brief list of the things that SAM can do: • Weather data, compatible with SAM, is plentiful and
easy to locate live on the Internet. • Solar availability is computed based on the weather
data and the collector properties, which are both easy to change. • All results can be displayed on graphs, hourly, daily
and monthly. • Any data that can be graphed can also be exported to
a spreadsheet for calculations and graphics created by the user. • Collector data is built into the program and can
easily be chosen or changed using a drop-down list. • SRCC test data is built into the collector data, so
heat output is based on actual test results. A comprehensive financial analysis is included with the
program, but using it is not mandatory for running the performance simulation.
A quick SDHW comparison In the final analysis, what you want from a solar water
heater is low fuel consumption and plenty of hot water at a reasonable cost. If the equipment is the right size for the water heating job, then very little conventional fuel will be consumed each year. So in that case, the annual fuel savings provides a good measurement of the success of a solar water heater. With that idea in mind, I created several identical solar
solar water heating included, almost as an afterthought. A sample hot water system that you can use as a starting
point includes reasonable default values for a typical system, including the collector, tank, heat exchanger, backup tank, backup fuel and all the other important details. Most of these details can be alternately supplied or changed by the user, including costs, hot water usage hour by hour and all the other variables you can think of. A location must be specified; the program will help you find weather data for any location from a number of
water heater models, using identical default values for many of the inputs. Then I changed the type of collector from a flat plate to a vacuum tube of comparable size in each location, Corvallis, Oregon and Marfa, Texas. All of the collectors modeled were nominal 40 square feet, tilted at latitude plus 15 degrees, which tends to maximize annual solar output. The water usage patterns were identical in all of the models, with just over 60 gallons of hot water consumed each day from an 80 gallon tank. The water usage was relatively continuous, consumed steadily but with varying flow rates throughout most of the day and night. This simulates a building with a high occupancy rate. A two-tank system was provided by SAM as default, with the solar heated tank feeding a conventional tank.
phc july 2011
www.phcnews.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88