This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
| eDiToriAl


improving on a daily basis; one can turn the clock back at the insertion of a needle. and while the preferred toxin of choice varies from physician to physician, it is not surprising that a recent study published in the Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery1


T Flickr Affiliated partners: has ignited furious debate


among the Twitterati with regard to which is better — Botox or Dysport? Well, when examining the effect of either toxin on crow’s feet at least. in a randomised, double-blind trial (funded by the makers of Dysport, medicis aesthetics inc.),


patients received injections of Botox (onabotulinum toxin a) on one side of the face and injections of Dysport (abobotulinum toxin a) on the other. according to the researchers, after 30 days two thirds of patients said they preferred the side of the face that had been treated with Dysport. however, the difference between the way in which both the participants in the study and the


A recent study has


researchers rated the effect of Dysport and Botox were only statistically significant when the eye muscles were contracted, rather than when they were at rest. regardless of the outcome, whether the results of the study will affect


ignited furious debate with regard to which is better — Botox or Dysport?


the physician’s or patient’s choice of toxin remains to be seen. it seems that most practitioners will often use the same product they’ve used for years, and that they are comfortable with, whether that is Botox/Vistabel, Dysport, Bocouture/Xeomin, or azzalure. and the patient, on the other hand, will not necessarily be aware of


TwitterWhile patient choice is certainly advocated in many of the world’s healthcare systems, it Retweet


seems that cosmetic surgery — whether invasive or non-invasive — remains one of the few medical professions in which the physician is King. far from being left in the dark with regard to treatment, the patient should be confident that the treatment will be safe, and that the health professional carrying out the procedure has the sufficient knowledge and skill to know exactly what to do with the product. so while Dysport might be better at reducing the appearance of crow’s feet, the physician


might be much better at using his/her choice of toxin or filler to the satisfaction of the patient. and ultimately, that’s what counts.


MySpace StumbleUpon


Rosalind Hill managing editor, PRIME rosalind.hill@informa.com; twitter.com/primeJournal


Digg


1. Nettar KD, Yu KCY, Bapna S, Boscardin J, Maas CS. An Internally Controlled, Double-blind Comparison of the Efficacy of OnabotulinumtoxinA and AbobotulinumtoxinA. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2011 [Epub ahead of print]


the differences between the range of botulinum toxins available. should we then, perhaps, consider the issue of patient choice when it comes to non-invasive cosmetic surgery? should he or she be allowed to request a specific filler or botulinum toxin, just as he or she is able to choose treatment on a specific area?


he eyes are perhaps one of The mosT significanT areas of The face to betray the tell-tale signs of ageing. not only do they express a person’s emotions, but through a loss of volume in the cheek and fine lines surrounding them, they can give away a person’s age almost instantaneously. Thankfully, we work in a continuously advancing industry, in which the techniques used to inject dermal fillers and botulinum toxin, for example, are


Mixx


We Are live on TWiTTer AnD linkeDin Join PRIME’s editorial team for the latest updates in aesthetics and


Skype @PrimeJournal Follow us ciousFriendFeed Flickr YouTube Technorati


anti-ageing medicine, debates, and interaction with your peers and colleagues, conference information and special offers


Search for Prime Journal


Twitter LinkedIn prime-journal.com | July 2011 Retweet ❚ 3


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84