This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Stephanie Salmon, Artemis Strategies; Jeff Hannapel & Christian Richter, The Policy Group, Washington, D.C. WASHINGTON ALERTMARKETING MATTERS


House Votes on Bill to Block EPA Climate Rules SENATE ALSO DEBATES AMENDMENTS TO SLOW EPA’S RULEMAKING AUTHORITY.


March to slash the U.S. Environ- mental Protection Agency’s (EPA) authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act. Te bill, the Energy Tax Prevention Act (H.R. 910), would prevent EPA from imposing regulations that could significantly raise energy costs for metalcasters and hurt the country’s economic recovery. In the House, the Energy Tax


T


Prevention Act is championed by Energy and Commerce Com- mittee Chairman Fred Upton (R-Mich.) and Energy and Power Subcommittee Chairman Ed Whitfield (R-Ky.). In the Senate, Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.) is the chief sponsor. The legislation would


prevent EPA from regulat- ing greenhouse gas emissions without prior congressional approval. Metalcasting industry advocates believe the costs to comply with greenhouse gas regulations incurred by utili-


ON THE HILL


House & Senate Move to Repeal 1099 Tax Forms


On March 3, by a bipartisan vote of 314-112, the House approved the Small Business Paperwork Man- date Elimination Act. The bill elimi- nates a requirement from the health care law requiring businesses to file 1099 tax forms to the Internal Revenue Service on purchases they make in excess of $600. This action follows on the heels of the Senate’s February vote to do the same. The issue is unlikely to move


forward for now, as the House and Senate disagree over an accept- able way to offset the $19 billion in


lost revenues that would result from the repeal. The Senate proposes that the Office of Management and Budget find unspent federal funds to use as an offset. The House offset calls for an increase in the amount consumers would be required to repay if they receive excess tax sub- sidies in health reform’s insurance exchanges. The White House has also endorsed repealing the health reform provision but doesn’t agree with the House’s solution.


Bipartisan Group Wants to Permanently Extend R&D Credit


A group of House members introduced


legislation in March to expand and permanently extend the tax credit for research and development. The bill, the American Research and Competitiveness Act of 2011 (H.R. 942), was introduced by Rep. Kevin Brady (R-Texas) and John Larson (D-Conn.), with the following three colleagues as original cosponsors: Reps. Doris Matsui (D-Calif.), Anna Eshoo (D-Calif.) and Erik Paulsen (R-Minn.). H.R. 942 would strengthen the R&D tax credit formula—the Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC)—from 14 to 20%.


For additional information, contact Stephanie Salmon, AFS Washington Office, 202/842-4864, ssalmon@afsinc.org.


April 2011 MODERN CASTING | 17


he House Energy and Com- merce Committee voted in


ties, refiners and large manufacturers will be passed along to their custom- ers, including metalcasting facilities, increasing their fuel and energy costs. The House bill has more than


40 cosponsors and was expected to come before the full House the week


of March 28. The legislation is the latest effort by Republicans to limit EPA’s authority. A spending bill passed by the House in February would slash funding at the agency by $3 billion and prohibit funding for the agency’s climate regulations through the end of September. In the Senate in March,


Minority Leader Mitch Mc- Connell (R-Ky.) introduced an amendment to a small-business bill that is identical to the House’s Energy Tax Prevention Act. In addition, Sen. Jay Rock- efeller (D-W.Va.) introduced an amendment that would delay EPA regulation of stationary source emissions of greenhouse gases for two years rather than fully remove its ability to regu- late them. Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont.)


Rep. Ed Whitfield


introduced an amendment that would codify EPA’s Tailoring Rule, which limits the applicability of the Clean Air Act’s prevention of significant deterioration permit- ting requirements.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68