This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Trans RINA, Vol 152, Part B2, Intl J Small Craft Tech, 2010 Jul-Dec 6. CONCLUSIONS


Three layups of L-bend composite specimens were tested under displacement control up to 100mm displacement. The failures of the specimens were monitored using acoustic emission. Failure prediction around the bend was performed using nonlinear finite element analysis. Load carrying capacity, failure initiation and progression were studied for each laminate. The bending load in this study generated more of interlaminar tensile compared to interlaminar shear stress.


stress 8.


Performance of Layup 3 was greater than the other two layups. The secondary reserve strength of layup 3 post initial failure (due to the presence of Unidirectional fibres), helped in carrying more load up to 1800N. Load carrying capacity of Layup 1 was greater than layup 1 but suffered catastrophic brittle failure. Layup 2 & 3 had DB layers which hold the structure in place, also helped in avoiding the catastrophic failure as seen with layup 1.


The damage mechanism, failure initiation & progression were assessed using Acoustic Emission parameters. Considering that the fibre composite systems used are fibre mats, and the specimens were subjected to an out- of-plane bending load, the proposed failure mechanisms are reasonable. The residual strength of the structure was identified so as to assist the boat builders in designing the curved structures. The improved knowledge of the low ratio of delamination strength to ultimate tensile strength for the laminates tested (particularly the mixed laminates - Layup 2 and Layup 3)


designers. 7.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 14.


First presented at the Pacific 2010 International Maritime Conference, January - 2010, Sydney, Australia.


15.


8. 1.


2. REFERENCES


SHENOI R.A., WANG W. Through-thickness stresses in curved composite laminates and sandwich beams, Composites Science and Technology, 61, pp. 1501-1512, 2001. MARTIN R.H, JACKSON W.C. prediction in


cross plied 3. 16. Damage curved composite


laminates, Composite materials: Fatigue and Fracture, Fourth Volume ASTM STP 1156, pp. 105-106, 1993.


WISNOM M.R., PETROSSIAN Z.J., JONES M.I. Interlaminar failure of


glass/epoxy due to combined through thickness shear and tension, Composites Part A, 27A, pp. 921-929, 1996.


4. 5.


KEDWARD K.T., WILSON R.S., MCLEAN SK Flexure of simply curved composite shapes, Composites, 20 (6,) pp.527-536 , 1989. HEINZ. D., RITCHER


B., WEBER S. Application of advanced materials for ship unidirectional 18. 19. 17. 6. 7. construction – Experience and problems,


Materials and Corrosion, 51, pp. 407-412, 2000.


DAVIES P., PETTON D. An experimental study of scale effects in Marine composites, Composites Part A, 30, pp. 267-275, 1999. KIM


J.K., delamination failure of


composites, Composite science and Technology, 60, pp. 745-761, 2000.


MOURITZ A.P., LEONG K.M., HERSZBERG I. A review of the effect of stitching on the in- plane mechanical properties of fibre-reinforced polymer composites, Composites Part A, 28, pp. 979-991, 1997.


9.


MOURITZ A.P., GALLAGHER J., GOODWIN A.A. Flexural strength and interlaminar shear strength of


repeated impact, Composites Science Technology, 87, pp. 509-522, 1997.


10. 11. 12. is of significance to the 13. Review, 55(2) pp. 89-106, 2002.


DODKINS A.R., SHENOI R.A., HAWKINS G.L. Design of joints and attachments in FRP ship structures, Marine Structures, 7, pp. 364- 398, 1994.


SMITH CS, Structural problems in the design of GRP ships, Procedures of Symposium on GRP Ship Construction, RINA, London, pp-33-56, 1972.


SMITH CS AND CHALMERS DW, Design of ship superstructures in fibre-reinforced plastic, RINA, London, pp. 45-62, 1987.


WISNOM M.R. 3-D Finite element analysis of curved beams in bending, Journal of Composite Material, 30(11), pp. 1178– 1190, 1996.


KACZMAREK K, WISNOM M.R, JONES M.I. Edge delamination in curved (04/±456)s glass- fibre/epoxy


Composite Science and Technology, 58, 155–161, 1998.


RAJU, PRUSTY BG., KELLY DW., LYONS D., PENG GD., Top hat stiffeners: A study on keel failures, Ocean Engineering, pp.1180-1192, 2010.


PRUSTY B G., RAY C., SATSANGI,


37(13), S.


Progressive failure analysis of laminated unstiffened and stiffened composite


Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 24 (6), 2005.


PRUSTY B.G. Linear static analysis of


composite hat-stiffened laminated shells using Finite elements, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 39, pp. 1125–113, 2003.


LIPTAI R.G., HARRIS D.O. Acoustic emission – An introductory review, Materials Research and Standards, 11(3), pp. 8-10, 1972.


panels,


beams loaded in bending, pp.


stitched GRP laminates following and


ANTONIO M., MIGUEL A.J. Application of finite element method to prediction of onset of delamination


growth, Applied Mechanical


SHAM M.L. Impact and woven-fabric


B-104


©2010: The Royal Institution of Naval Architects


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66