This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Trans RINA, Vol 152, Part B2, Intl J Small Craft Tech, 2010 Jul-Dec


Figure 4.3: Acoustic Emission parameter Correlation for Layup 2 specimens 4.3(a) Layup 3 (Csm+Db+Ud) Experimental Results


Interestingly the third layup consisting of CSM+DB+ Uni Directional (UD) had high ultimate strength but low stiffness until the first ply failure. The process of crack initiation and progression is shown in Figure 5.1. However the


post-failure behaviour observed had


increased residual strength as shown in Fig. 5.2. Further application of load past the first failure point, the CSM fibres sheared away in tension shown as kinks in the load-displacement plot. The DB layers were more flexible, and remained intact. Upon further loading, the bend started to vanish and the specimen began to straighten up, thus behaving like a tensile specimen, as shown in Figure


carried the entire load until final collapse. Hence addition of uni-directional proved beneficial.


5.1. Only the uni-directional fibres fibres in composite curved panels


4.3(b) Layup 3 (Csm+Db+Ud) Acoustic Emission Correlation


Layup 3 had two CSM, two UD and three DB layers. The initial damage was observed at 9% of the ultimate load at 370 sec between second and third layers, as shown in Figure 5.3. Though no reduction of load was observed (due to the presence of UD fibres which carried most of the load), other AE parameters showed extensive matrix cracking and


fibre breakage – energy of 2103eu,


amplitude of 95dB and event duration of 4076μs were observed. The six peaks in the energy and event duration plots demonstrate progressive delamination until final collapse. The first major damage was observed at 438 sec at 14% of ultimate load, as the delamination between second and third layers. The energy release was 6496eu, amplitude was 100dB, rise time was 469μs and duration was 20912μs during the second stage of damage. Further delaminations were observed at 550sec (14% of ultimate


B-100 ©2010: The Royal Institution of Naval Architects


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66