TUESDAY, DECEMBER 21, 2010 COLLEGE FOOTBALL
“They toldmethat they want to go to the Orange Bowl and to have teams go to the Orange Bowl.” Kevin Anderson, Maryland athletic director, explaining what the school’s football players want
KLMNO
EZ SU PROFESSIONAL BASKETBALL
EASTERNCONFERENCE SOUTHEAST W L PCT. GB L10 xMiami
21 8 .724
xOrlando xAtlanta
xCharlotte
xWashington ATLANTIC
Boston New York
Philadelphia Toronto
New Jersey CENTRAL
Chicago xIndiana
xMilwaukee Detroit
xCleveland
16 10 .615 31/2 17 12 .586
9 17 .346 101/2 6 19 .240
— 10-0 4-6
4 5-5 3-7
13 1-9
W L PCT. GB L10 22 4 .846 16 12 .571
11 16 .407 111/2 10 18 .357 8 20 .286
12 14 .462 41/2 10 15 .400 9 19 .321 8 19 .296
81/2
— 10-0 7 7-3 7-3
13 3-7 15 2-8
W L PCT. GB L10 16 9 .640
— 7-3 3-7
6 5-5 3-7
9 1-9
WESTERNCONFERENCE SOUTHWEST W L PCT. GB L10 xSan Antonio xDallas
xNew Orleans xHouston Memphis
23 3 .885 21 5 .808 16 11 .593
71/2
12 15 .444 111/2 12 16 .429
Denver xPortland
xMinnesota PACIFIC
L.A. Lakers xPhoenix
xGolden State xL.A. Clippers Sacramento
X - LATE GAME
MONDAY’SGAMES Charlotte atWashington, Late Orlando at Atlanta, Late Utah at Cleveland, Late New Orleans at Indiana, Late Dallas at Miami, Late Phoenix at San Antonio, Late Milwaukee at Portland, Late Houston at Golden State, Late Minnesota at L.A. Clippers, Late
TUESDAY’SGAMES
Oklahoma City at Charlotte, 7 Dallas at Orlando, 7 Philadelphia at Chicago, 8 New Jersey at Memphis, 8 Golden State at Sacramento, 10 Milwaukee at L.A. Lakers, 10:30
WEDNESDAY’SGAMES JONATHAN NEWTON/THE WASHINGTON POST Maryland Athletic DirectorKevin Anderson said he wants a coach who will bring out the best in his players as athletes and students. Maryland to fire Friedgen, pursue Leach terrapins from D1
make a change. Friedgen was unwilling to retire and instead will be fired following Mary- land’s appearance in the Dec. 29 Military Bowl at RFK Stadium. His contract will be terminated effective Jan. 2, 2011, and hewill be paid a buyout of roughly $2 million. No state funds will be used to
pay out the contracts of Fried- gen and his assistants, Ander- son said. The funds for the buyouts will come entirely from “revenue generation, private fundraising and strategic busi- ness decisions,” according to a release issued by the school’s athletic department. Friedgen, who was not avail-
able to comment, went 74-50 in 10 years at his alma mater and won ACC coach of the year honors in his first and last seasons. He led the Terrapins to seven bowl appearances, includ- ing the Orange Bowl in 2001 after the team finished atop the conference standings. Only two football coaches in programhis- tory amassed more victories than Friedgen, who turned around a squad thatwent 2-10 in 2009. The Terrapins went 8-4 this
past season and finished in a three-way tie for third place in the ACC. However, attendance at Byrd Stadiumflagged despite the success, and perhaps as a result, Maryland fell to the eighth slot in the conference’s
pecking order. After he shared his decision with members of the team’s leadership council earlier Monday, Anderson said the players told himthey did not want to leave their postseason destiny in the hands of others in future seasons. “They told me that they want
to go to the Orange Bowl and to have teams go to the Orange Bowl and they don’t have to count on anybody else to make the decision for them,” Ander- son said in a news conference. “That’s the kind of person they want me to hire for their next football coach.” Though Leach was the only
name Anderson would specify as being on his list of possible successors, he did offer some of the qualities he will search for in the program’s next head coach. “I want somebody who can
have the kind of intellect to communicate and to bring the best out of our players, both as a football player, as a student and as a person,” Anderson said. “I believe that if we hire the right person that can do that, that we’ll be successful in all phases.” Leach, 49, went 84-43 in 10
seasons with the Red Raiders and operated a prolific, pass- happy offense. Texas Tech fired him after he refused to apolo- gize for allegedly ordering a player who had suffered a con- cussion to stand in a darkened garage near the team’s practice facility during an afternoon
workout. Leach later filed a lawsuit against the university, claiming wrongful termination. Regardless of who takes over
Maryland’s football program, his first few tasks will include holding together what had been considered a quality recruiting class and convincing players currently on the roster to stay put. One such player is redshirt
freshman quarterback Danny O’Brien, the ACC rookie of the year this fall. O’Brien’s mother, Janie Wright, said in a tele- phone interview that her son willwait until Friedgen’s succes- sor is hired before deciding whether to remain at Maryland or transfer to another school. “That would make the most
sense,” Wright said. “A rash decision can’t bemade.We wish [offensive coordinator James] Franklin had remained.Wewish things were the way we thought the agreement was, that Coach Friedgen had remained. Appar- ently, others had different ideas.” Anderson said that had
Franklin not left for Vanderbilt, Friedgen would have remained Maryland’s coach next season. On Nov. 18, Anderson released a statement guaranteeing Fried- gen would return for the final year of his contract, but he declined to give Friedgen the contract extension the coach desired. When it became clear last week that Franklin was leaving
ON FOOTBALL Fair or not, Friedgen’s firing reflects a bottom-line business on football from D1
coach of the year. Anderson told Friedgen last
monthhewouldbebackfor2011, the final year of his contract. At that moment, Friedgen might have overplayed his hand, all but publicly demanding a contract extension and telling recruits he expected to coach them for the majority of their college careers. If Anderson was sold on the
idea of an extension, he would have announced it right after the victory overN.C. State. It is clear now the only thing that kept Anderson from moving Friedgen out sooner was the $1 million albatross Yow left behind with the ludicrous “coach-in-waiting” deal she gave James Franklin almost two years ago. Friedgen isn’t being fired
because he can’t coach.He had a record of 74-50 in 10 years after taking over a moribund program at his alma mater. He went to seven bowl games. The anomaly of 2009 aside, he put together a solid program. But that wasn’t enough.
Friedgen’s being fired because he no longer excitesMaryland fans even when he’s winning. They sent that message loud and clear this past season, and there was no reason to believe that would change next fall. Anderson didn’t want to commit to Friedgen through 2014, and he recognized Friedgen was right when he said recruiting would be hampered by being a lame- duck coach. Once Franklin left for Vanderbilt, Anderson had to make his move, one way or the other. In a perfect world, Friedgen
would have been given a new contract. He’s a good coach who has been good toMaryland.He is an alumnus, someone who — like Gary Williams — didn’t see coaching at Maryland as a job, but as a calling. He deserved to go out with dignity, choosing his exit path. But that’s not how big- time athletics works. Sometimes winning isn’t
enough. You have to win more. And sell more. In Leach, Anderson sees an opportunity to do both. There is no doubt that
Leach will bring an exciting brand of football, and with a quarterback as talented as Danny O’Brien, Maryland could be an explosive offensive team next year. What’s more, Leach, 49, had a better record (84-43) in 10 seasons in the much tougher Big 12 than Friedgen did in the ACC, even though he never won a division title. Leach does have baggage. His
firing a year ago in the wake of the Adam James controversy led to charges, counter-charges and a still-ongoing lawsuit. Will Maryland fans care if Leach swaggers in and his teams run roughshod over the ACC? No. They’ll buy tickets and might even start to fill some of those ill-conceived luxury boxes at Byrd Stadium. Of course, Anderson had
better land Leach, who will be expensive. Chances are, he wouldn’t have jettisoned Friedgen if he wasn’t pretty certain he had a deal for a successor. All of that said, it is sad to see Friedgen go out this way.
Apparently, Friedgen spent most of the weekend listening to people try to convince him to show up for his own execution. Maryland had offered to put the best face possible on his departure, but this is a firing, pure and simple. All the hyperbole in the world can’t change that. Ralph Friedgen, Maryland
class of 1970, who came back to breathe life into his school’s football program,is being kicked to the curb. There’s no way to spin that and make it pretty. But big-time college sports
isn’t about aesthetics. It’s about the bottom line. And Anderson and the leadership at Maryland thinkLeach can put more fans in red into the stands and less red inkontheir
books.That’s theone and only reason Friedgen is gone. At Maryland, like all its brethren, it’s the only reason that matters.
For more from the author, visit his blog at
www.feinsteinonthebrink.com sports@washpost.com
the program, Anderson deter- mined that hiring a quality offensive coordinator and likely a host of other new assistants would be futile, given that Fried- gen had one year remaining on a contract the athletic director was unwilling to extend. On Wednesday, Anderson
pressured Friedgen to resign or retire immediately so that the school could announce the move in a news conference Fri- day, according to a source close to Friedgen. According to the source, Anderson told Friedgen that Maryland President Wal- lace D. Loh “wants this done now.” Friedgen declined to retire, a
stance he maintained through- out the weekend. The source said that after a hostile conver- sation with Friedgen’s represen- tative, Anderson handed off dis- cussions to university legal counsel Susan Bayly, who at- tempted to entice Friedgen to step down with offers such as to affix his name on the Ring of Honor at Byrd Stadium. Around 10 a.m. Monday
morning, Bayly asked one final time if Friedgen had changed his mind. The answer: No. And so Maryland elected to fire its once-beloved football coach. At the news conference, Loh
said, “I admireMr. Anderson for making that principled deci- sion, even though that pained himand painedme.”
yandas@washpost.com prisbelle@washpost.com
Chicago atWashington, 7 Cleveland at Atlanta, 7 Detroit at Toronto, 7 Philadelphia at Boston, 7:30 Oklahoma City at New York, 7:30 Utah at Minnesota, 8 New Jersey at New Orleans, 8 Denver at San Antonio, 8:30 Houston at L.A. Clippers, 10:30
SUNDAY’SRESULTS
at Boston 99, Indiana 88 at New Jersey 89, Atlanta 82 L.A. Lakers 120, at Toronto 110 Houston 102, at Sacramento 93 at Detroit 111, New Orleans 108 (OT) Phoenix 113, at Oklahoma City 110
WIZARDS’NEXTTHREE
vs. Bulls Tomorrow, 7 Comcast SportsNet
at Spurs Dec. 26, 7 Comcast SportsNet
at Rockets Dec. 27, 8:30 Comcast SportsNet
Radio:WJFK (106.7 FM)
JAZZ101,CAVALIERS90 CJ Miles scored 22 points, Paul
Millsap and Raja Bell added 19 apiece and Utah beat Cleveland, moving Coach Jerry Sloan into a tie with Pat Riley for the third-most wins in NBA history. Deron Williams had 17 points and
10assists as the Jazz improved to 11-1 against the Eastern Conference. Sloan, Utah’s coach since 1988,
has matched Riley with 1,210 victo- ries. Up next is LennyWilkens (1,332) and Don Nelson (1,335). During Sloan’s long run, which be-
gan before Jazz rookie Gordon Hay- ward was born, there have been 234 coaching changes across the league. Daniel Gibson scored a career-high
29 for the Cavaliers, who have lost 11 of 12.
Sloan is the only coach to win 1,000
games with one team, and is one of just three coaches — Riley and Phil Jackson arethe others—tohavemore than 15 consecutive winning seasons. Jazz F Mehmet Okur sprained his
right ankle during pregame warmups and had to sit out of the game.
UTAH .................................. 24 25 27 25 — 101 CLEVELAND ....................... 20 24 20 26 — 90
UTAH Millsap
Kirilenko Jefferson DWilliams Bell
Miles Elson
Watson Price
Hayward TOTALS
MIN
33:11 9-13 1-2 2-7 2 3 19 32:58
FG FT O-T A PF PTS 2-9 2-2 1-5 4 3
38:11 7-13 2-4 4-13 2 2 16 39:01 6-16 4-4 1-5 10 1 17 36:03
25:47 8-16 2-2 3-4 5 4 22 11:32 15:52 5:04 2:21
6-9 2-2 0-3 2 1 19 1-3 0-0 1-2 0 5
0-1 0-0 1-4 3 1 0-1 0-0 0-0 0 0 0-1 0-0 0-1 0 0
2 0 0 0
240 39-82 13-16 13-44 28 20 101
Percentages: FG .476, FT .813. 3-Point Goals: 10-23, .435 (Bell 5-6, Miles 4-10, D.Williams 1-4, Price 0-1, Kirilenko 0-2). Team Rebounds: 6. Team Turnovers: 10 (15 PTS). Blocked Shots: 3 (Jefferson, Kirilenko, Watson). Turn- overs: 10 (D.Williams 5, Kirilenko 2, Jefferson, Miles, Price). Steals: 3 (Miles, Watson, D.Williams). Technical Fouls: None.
CLEVELAND Parker
Jamison Varejao
MWilliams Gibson
Sessions Hickson Moon
JWilliams Harris
Samuels TOTALS
MIN FG FT O-T A PF PTS
37:43 4-10 2-4 2-3 1 1 11 41:35 5-17 1-2 0-6 2 1 13 32:14
4-6 1-2 1-5 1 1 1-2 0-0 0-0 2 0
38:08 5-15 4-4 1-6 10 3 16 36:21 8-15 6-6 1-4 4 4 29 16:28 21:33 7:11 7:31 0:38 0:38
3-4 4-7 1-9 0 3 10 0-2 0-0 0-0 0 1 0-1 0-0 0-0 1 0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0 0 0-0 0-0 0-1 0 0
240 30-72 18-25 6-34 21 14 90
Percentages: FG .417, FT .720. 3-Point Goals: 12-28, .429 (Gibson 7-8, M.Williams 2-7, Jamison 2-8, Parker 1-5). Team Rebounds: 11. Team Turnovers: 9 (11 PTS). Blocked Shots: 2 (Varejao 2). Turnovers: 8 (M.Williams 3, Sessions 2, Gibson, Hickson, J.Williams). Steals: 8 (Jamison 3, Gibson 2, Parker 2, J.Williams). Technical Fouls: None. A: 20,562 (20,562). T: 2:02.
9
2 0
0 0 0
6
MAVERICKS98,HEAT96 Dirk Nowitzki scored 26 points and
Jason Terry hit two big three-pointers in the final 2½ minutes as Dallas ended Miami’s 12-game winning streak. It was Dallas’ 14th straight regular
season win over the Heat. TheMaver- ickswere the last teamto beatMiami.
DALLAS .............................. 23 20 22 33 — 98 MIAMI ................................. 22 22 24 28 — 96
DALLAS Butler
Nowitzki Chandler Kidd
Stevenson Marion Terry
Haywood Barea
TOTALS MIN 28:25
FG FT O-T A PF PTS 4-9 4-5 0-2 3 1 13
38:41 8-21 10-10 0-9 2 4 26 30:46 38:33 14:50 28:54
3-3 2-2 2-10 0 5 3-5 0-0 0-4 7 3 3-8 0-0 0-0 0 2 2-7 3-4 5-13 3 3
2-2 0-1 1-4 0 3 2-4 1-2 1-5 2 1
8 7 8 7
30:42 6-15 4-4 1-1 2 1 19 17:14 11:55
4 6
240 33-74 24-28 10-48 19 23 98
Percentages: FG .446, FT .857. 3-Point Goals: 8-21, .381 (Terry3-6,Stevenson2-5,Barea1-2,Butler1-2,Kidd1-2, Nowitzki 0-4). Team Rebounds: 5. Team Turnovers: 14 (11 PTS).BlockedShots: 1 (Marion). Turnovers: 13 (Kidd 3,Marion3,Barea2,Butler2,Chandler,Haywood,Terry). Steals: 6 (Butler 2, Barea, Haywood, Kidd, Stevenson). Technical Fouls: Defensive three second, 9:16 third
MIAMI James
Bosh
Ilgauskas Arroyo Wade
Howard
Chalmers JJones
Anthony Miller
TOTALS MIN FG FT O-T A PF PTS
36:05 6-17 5-7 3-10 7 4 19 35:56 8-15 3-5 2-8 0 0 19 18:07 18:14
4-8 0-0 2-4 0 2 0-2 0-0 0-0 1 1
0-2 0-0 1-2 1 0
8 0
39:05 8-17 3-6 1-4 7 1 22 12:04
0
29:46 3-10 4-4 2-4 2 6 13 18:23 28:28 3:52
3-7 1-1 0-2 0 3 10 2-2 1-2 3-6 0 2 0-4 0-0 2-4 0 1
5 0
240 34-84 17-25 16-44 18 20 96
Percentages: FG .405, FT .680. 3-Point Goals: 11-31, .355 (Chalmers 3-7,
J.Jones 3-7,Wade 3-7, James 2-4,Arroyo 0-1, Bosh 0-1, Miller 0-4). Team Rebounds: 6. Team Turnovers: 12 (13 PTS). Blocked Shots: 6 (Ilgauskas 2, Wade 2, Howard,
J.Jones). Turnovers: 12 (James 5, Arroyo 3, Chalmers 2,
J.Jones,Wade). Steals: 7 (Chalm- ers 3,Wade 3,
J.Jones). Technical Fouls:Defensive three second, 8:33 second .A: 20,178 (19,600). T: 2:19.
HAWKS91,MAGIC81 Al Horford scored 24 points and
Atlanta rolled to a victory over Dwight Howard and reconstructed Orlando. Howard had 19 points and 20 re- bounds.
ORLANDO ........................... 14 24 20 23 — 81 ATLANTA ........................... 20 23 22 26 — 91
ORLANDO Turkoglu
Bass
Howard Nelson
JRichardson Allen
Arenas
QRichardson Redick
TOTALS MIN 35:07
FG FT O-T A PF PTS 1-4 5-6 0-6 3 3
3-8 2-2 0-2 3 4 0-3 0-0 0-1 1 3
0-4 0-0 0-1 0 2 2-4 0-1 0-0 0 1
8
30:50 5-12 3-3 1-5 1 2 13 42:06 6-14 7-12 5-20 1 5 19 31:04 6-11 5-5 0-2 3 3 18 30:37 13:13
26:41 2-11 5-6 0-1 3 4 10 19:25 10:58
240:01 25-71 27-35 6-38 15 27 81
Percentages: FG .352, FT .771. 3-Point Goals: 4-17, .235 (Turkoglu 1-3, Arenas 1-4, Nelson 1-4, J.Richardson 1-4, Redick 0-1, Q.Richardson 0-1). Team Rebounds: 9. Team Turnovers: 12 (17 PTS). Blocked Shots: 2 (Howard 2). Turnovers: 12 (Howard 6, Arenas 2, Nelson 2, Allen, Redick). Steals: 9 (Bass 2, Howard 2, Nelson 2, Allen, Q.Richardson, Turkoglu). Technical Fouls: Defensive three second, 4:15 first
ATLANTA Smith
Horford Collins Bibby
Johnson Pachulia
MWilliams Evans
Teague Thomas Wilkins
TOTALS MIN FG FT O-T A PF PTS
42:48 3-14 5-8 3-10 3 5 12 37:39 10-15 4-8 2-11 4 1 24 24:24
2-4 1-1 1-3 1 5 0-3 2-2 3-7 2 5
39:37 6-13 0-0 1-3 4 4 15 38:01 7-18 2-3 1-5 6 4 17 10:47 26:25 4:56 8:23 4:41 2:19
4-8 3-5 2-9 2 1 12 0-1 0-0 0-1 0 0 1-3 0-0 0-0 1 0 0-0 2-2 0-1 0 1 0-1 0-0 0-1 0 0
240 33-80 19-29 13-51 23 26 91
Percentages: FG .413, FT .655. 3-Point Goals: 6-18, .333 (Bibby 3-6, Smith 1-2, M.Williams 1-3, Johnson 1-4, Evans 0-1, Teague 0-1, Wilkins 0-1).TeamRebounds: 13. TeamTurnovers: 16 (23 PTS). Blocked Shots: 6 (Smith 3, Horford, Pachulia, Teague). Turnovers: 15 (Johnson 5, Smith 3, Bibby 2, Teague 2, Collins, Evans, Pachulia). Steals: 3 (Collins, Teague, M.Williams). Technical Fouls: Defensive three second, 0:45 first A: 16,275 (18,729). T: 2:32.
5
2 0
2 2 0
9 0
0 4
19 9 .679 19 9 .679 16 10 .615 14 14 .500 6 22 .214
— 9-1 2 9-1 4-6 7-3
12 4-6
NORTHWEST W L PCT. GB L10 Oklahoma City xUtah
— 7-3 — 6-4 2 6-4 5 6-4 13 2-8
W L PCT. GB L10 21 7 .750 13 13 .500 9 17 .346 7 21 .250
5 20 .200 141/2
— 8-2 7 5-5 11 2-8 14 4-6 1-9
WIZARDS108,BOBCATS75
CHARLOTTE ....................... 25 20 11 19 — 75 WASHINGTON ................... 32 18 31 27 — 108 CHARLOTTE McGuire
MIN 21:05 Diaw
Mohammed Augustin Jackson
Livingston KBrown Thomas
Henderson Diop
DBrown TOTALS
30:11
FG FT O-T A PF PTS 0-2 0-0 1-6 1 3
32:02 4-11 1-2 2-7 4 2 9:44
2-4 0-0 0-0 0 4 3-8 2-2 0-2 4 4
3-7 1-1 0-1 3 0
30:21 5-12 2-3 0-2 2 1 13 24:18 20:53 20:03 15:09 17:23 18:52
1-2 8-11 2-5 0 2 10 5-7 0-0 1-4 0 2 10 1-3 0-2 1-1 2 2 1-2 0-0 0-2 1 3 3-4 3-4 2-4 1 2
240:01 28-62 17-25 9-34 18 25 75
Percentages: FG .452, FT .680. 3-Point Goals: 2-9, .222 (Augustin 1-3, Jackson 1-3, Diaw 0-3). Team Rebounds: 8. Team Turnovers: 29 (32 PTS). Blocked Shots: 2 (Diop, McGuire). Turnovers: 27 (Jackson 6, Henderson 4,
D.Brown 3, Diaw 3,
K.Brown 2, Diop 2, Livingston 2, Thomas 2, Augustin, McGuire, Mohammed). Steals: 6 (
D.Brown 2, Diaw, Diop, Henderson, Livingston). Techni- cal Fouls: Mohammed, 2, 8:30 third. Ejections: Moham- med, 8:30 third.
WASHINGTON Thornton
Blatche McGee Hinrich Young
Armstrong Howard Booker Hudson Martin
Seraphin TOTALS
MIN 32:13
FG FT O-T A PF PTS 6-8 1-1 1-3 3 3 13
35:07 6-13 7-9 1-5 0 3 19 27:57
3-4 4-6 0-3 0 4 10
30:57 7-14 4-4 1-6 11 3 18 35:06 8-13 2-2 0-2 1 5 21 12:50 20:52 15:17 17:03 7:58 4:40
0-2 2-2 1-2 0 4 2-7 1-2 0-3 1 3 1-2 4-4 2-3 0 0 3-6 0-0 0-1 6 1 1-3 0-0 0-1 0 0 1-1 0-0 0-2 0 0
240 38-73 25-30 6-31 22 26 108
Percentages: FG .521, FT .833. 3-Point Goals: 7-16, .438 (Young 3-6,Hudson2-3, Martin 1-1,Howard1-2, Blatche 0-2, Hinrich 0-2).TeamRebounds: 9.TeamTurnovers: 14 (16 PTS). Blocked Shots: 7 (McGee 5, Hudson, Thorn- ton). Turnovers: 14 (Young 5, Hinrich 3, Hudson 3, Armstrong, Booker, Howard). Steals: 10 (Hudson 3, Hinrich 2, Blatche, Booker, Howard, McGee, Thornton). Technical Fouls: Delay of game, 5:09 third. A: 13,825 (20,173). T: 2:14.
PACERS94,HORNETS93 Mike Dunleavy’s tip-in at the buzzer
gave Indiana a victory over New Or- leans. The Hornets had taken the lead on
a jumper by David West with 3.9 seconds left. Indiana’s Danny Granger’s long
shot rattled around the rim, and Dun- leavy was uncontested for the re- bound under the hoop.
NEWORLEANS .................. 16 27 26 24 — 93 INDIANA ............................. 24 28 16 26 — 94
NEWORLEANS MIN Ariza
West Okafor
Belinelli Paul
Thornton Smith Jack
Andersen TOTALS
35:23 1-13 2-2 2-9 1 3 35:06 6-13 6-7 2-4 1 2 18 34:13
7-8 5-8 4-15 1 1 19
33:30 7-14 0-4 1-3 2 3 14 35:46 4-11 6-6 1-4 4 3 15 20:38 13:00 25:50 6:34
2-9 1-2 6-11 3 0 3-5 2-2 2-3 0 2 3-8 1-1 0-2 6 0 0-2 0-0 0-2 0 0
240 33-83 23-32 18-53 18 14 93
Percentages: FG .398, FT .719. 3-Point Goals: 4-15, .267 (Jack 2-3, Thornton 1-1, Paul 1-2, Andersen 0-1, Belinelli 0-3, Ariza 0-5). Team Rebounds: 12. Team Turnovers: 18 (19 PTS). Blocked Shots: 5 (Okafor 3, Ariza, West). Turnovers: 13 (Paul 6, Thornton 2, West 2, Andersen, Ariza, Okafor). Steals: 9 (Jack 3, Okafor 2, Ariza, Belinelli, Paul, West). Technical Fouls: None.
INDIANA Granger
Foster Hibbert
Dunleavy Collison
Hansbrough Ford
SJones Rush
Posey TOTALS MIN
36:24 8-22 7-8 1-6 2 5 27 22:06
FG FT O-T A PF PTS 3-4 1-1 3-11 2 3
20:12 16:28 30:20 18:43
0-2 1-2 0-1 0 3 3-4 0-0 0-1 5 2 1-2 2-4 1-2 1 0 2-7 0-0 0-3 2 1
24:38 1-10 0-0 1-3 0 2 27:30 3-11 2-2 1-3 4 3 34:32 8-11 2-2 1-5 5 2 18 9:07
5-7 0-0 0-4 1 2 15 240 34-80 15-19 8-39 22 23 94
Percentages: FG .425, FT .789. 3-Point Goals: 11-23, .478 (Posey 5-7, Granger 4-8, Rush 2-4, Dunleavy 0-4). Team Rebounds: 5. Team Turnovers: 15 (14 PTS). Blocked Shots: 11 (Foster 4, Hibbert 2, Dunleavy, Ford, Granger,
S.Jones, Rush). Turnovers:14(Collison 4, Hibbert 3, Ford 2, Dunleavy, Foster, Granger, Posey, Rush). Steals: 8 (Collison 2, Dunleavy 2, Ford, Hibbert, Posey, Rush). Technical Fouls: Defensive three second, 8:41 second. A: 12,271 (18,165). T: 2:22.
7 2 8
1 6 4 6
6 8 9 0
FG FT O-T A PF PTS 4
2 6 6 8 3 2
D7
0 9 4 9
7
2 2 9
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56